Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中采用“半回收夹栓”技术进行血栓切除术

Thrombectomy Using "Clamping Embolus with Semi-Retrieval" Technique in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Liu Zhen-Sheng, Zhou Long-Jiang, Sun Yong, Kuang Xiong-Wei, Wang Jia-Xiang, Zhang Xin-Jiang

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;27(3):733-739. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Embolization of thrombus fragments in new or downstream vascular territories is a potential adverse event in neurothrombectomy, requiring additional repeated thrombectomy attempts. This study aims to describe technical results of the thrombectomy with clamping embolus technique (TCET) method in acute ischemic stroke. This study also aims to evaluate the efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy by TCET, and to compare it with conventional stent retriever thrombectomy (CSRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 52 consecutive patients treated between January 2015 and October 2016 for intracranial large vessel occlusion by stent retriever thrombectomy. Recanalization rates, procedure durations, and thrombectomy attempts were compared between the TCET and the CSRT groups.

RESULTS

Successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] 2b or 3) with TCET was achieved in 91.7% (22 of 24) versus 92.9% (26 of 28) in the CSRT group (P = .921). To preserve the restored patency of severely affected atherosclerotic intracranial vessels, 7 and 8 patients received angioplasty or stenting in the TCET and CSRT groups, respectively. In embolic cases, the number of thrombectomy attempts with TCET was significantly lower than that obtained with CSRT (1.7 ± .2 versus 2.6 ± .5, respectively; P = .001); the one-pass thrombectomy rate was significantly higher in the TCET group than in the CSRT-treated patients (58.8% versus 25.0%, respectively; P = .014). Procedure duration was significantly shorter by TCET than by CSRT (35.8 ± 5.8 minutes versus 55.5 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy by TCET in acute ischemic stroke might be improved compared with CSRT.

摘要

背景

在神经血栓切除术过程中,血栓碎片在新的或下游血管区域的栓塞是一种潜在的不良事件,这需要额外反复尝试进行血栓切除术。本研究旨在描述采用夹闭栓子技术(TCET)进行血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中的技术结果。本研究还旨在评估TCET机械取栓的效率,并将其与传统的支架取栓器血栓切除术(CSRT)进行比较。

材料与方法

对2015年1月至2016年10月期间连续接受支架取栓器血栓切除术治疗颅内大血管闭塞的52例患者进行回顾性分析。比较了TCET组和CSRT组的再通率、手术时间和血栓切除术尝试次数。

结果

TCET组成功再通(脑梗死溶栓分级[TICI]2b或3级)的比例为91.7%(24例中的22例),CSRT组为92.9%(28例中的26例)(P = 0.921)。为保持严重受累的动脉粥样硬化颅内血管恢复的通畅性,TCET组和CSRT组分别有7例和8例患者接受了血管成形术或支架置入术。在栓塞病例中,TCET的血栓切除术尝试次数显著低于CSRT(分别为1.7±0.2次和2.6±0.5次;P = 0.001);TCET组的一次通过血栓切除术率显著高于CSRT治疗的患者(分别为58.8%和25.0%;P = 0.014)。TCET的手术时间显著短于CSRT(分别为35.8±5.8分钟和55.5±7.2分钟;P = 0.001)。

结论

与CSRT相比,TCET在急性缺血性卒中的机械取栓效率可能有所提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验