Jones R M, Goodacre C J, Moore B K, Dykema R W
Department of Prosthodontics, Indiana University, School of Dentistry, Indianapolis.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Jan;61(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90105-4.
Four resin materials used to veneer metal castings were compared by evaluating certain physical properties. Three of the materials were microfilled resins and one was an unfilled resin. Although no material proved to be superior in all of the tests, the microfilled materials were generally better than the unfilled materials. The heat- and pressure- polymerized microfilled material was inferior to the two light-polymerized microfilled materials in three of the physical property tests, superior to them in one test, and proved to be equivalent to them in two tests.
通过评估某些物理性能，对用于金属铸件贴面的四种树脂材料进行了比较。其中三种材料是微填料树脂，一种是无填料树脂。尽管没有一种材料在所有测试中都表现出优越性，但微填料材料总体上比无填料材料更好。在三项物理性能测试中，热压聚合微填料材料不如两种光聚合微填料材料，在一项测试中优于它们，在两项测试中与它们相当。
