Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):171-178. doi: 10.2319/062017-407. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
To evaluate the effects of bone regeneration materials and orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) timing on tooth movement through alveolar bone defects treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) utilizing xenografts (Bio-Oss) and alloplast (β-TCP).
Twenty-four standard alveolar bone defects in six male beagle dogs were treated by GBR using either Bio-Oss or β-TCP (experimental), whereas the control defects were left empty. The defects were further grouped into early or late subgroups, depending on OTM timing after GBR (ie 1 month or 2 months, respectively). Rates of OTM were measured intraorally, while computed tomography scan images were used to assess bone density, alveolar bone height, second premolar displacement, and tipping tendency.
Generally, the Bio-Oss early and Bio-Oss late subgroups recorded the lowest amount of tooth movement compared with other modes of GBRs assessed. Before OTM, the control group registered significantly lower bone height compared with the Bio-Oss and β-TCP groups ( P < .01). The control group was inferior on bone density and bone height compared with Bio-Oss and β-TCP.
The Bio-Oss group had favorable radiologic features (higher alveolar bone level and bone density with less premolar tipping) but showed slower OTM than the control group. The late OTM subgroup had favorable radiologic features and showed faster tooth movement than the early OTM in the β -TCP group.
评估骨再生材料和正畸牙齿移动(OTM)时机对引导骨再生(GBR)治疗中利用异种移植物(Bio-Oss)和同种异体移植物(β-TCP)治疗牙槽骨缺损的牙齿移动的影响。
在六只雄性比格犬的 24 个标准牙槽骨缺损中,通过 GBR 使用 Bio-Oss 或β-TCP(实验组)进行治疗,而对照组的缺损则为空。根据 GBR 后 OTM 的时间(即分别为 1 个月或 2 个月)将缺陷进一步分为早期或晚期亚组。通过口腔内测量 OTM 率,同时使用计算机断层扫描图像评估骨密度、牙槽骨高度、第二前磨牙移位和倾斜趋势。
总体而言,与评估的其他 GBR 模式相比,Bio-Oss 早期和 Bio-Oss 晚期亚组记录的牙齿移动量最少。在 OTM 之前,与 Bio-Oss 和β-TCP 组相比,对照组的骨高度明显较低(P<0.01)。与 Bio-Oss 和β-TCP 相比,对照组的骨密度和骨高度较低。
Bio-Oss 组具有良好的影像学特征(较高的牙槽骨水平和骨密度,较少的前磨牙倾斜),但与对照组相比,OTM 较慢。β-TCP 组晚期 OTM 亚组具有良好的影像学特征,与早期 OTM 相比,牙齿移动更快。