Farre Albert, Rapley Tim
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK.
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Nov 18;5(4):88. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040088.
The importance of how disease and illness are conceptualised lies in the fact that such definition is paramount to understand the boundaries and scope of responsibility associated with medical work. In this paper, we aim to provide an overview of the interplay of these understandings in shaping the nature of medical work, philosophically, and in practice. We first discuss the emergence of the biopsychosocial model as an attempt to both challenge and broaden the traditional biomedical model. Then, we outline the main criticisms associated with the biopsychosocial model and note a range of contributions addressing the shortcomings of the model as initially formulated. Despite recurrent criticisms and uneven uptake, the biopsychosocial model has gone on to influence core aspects of medical practice, education, and research across many areas of medicine. One of these areas is adolescent medicine, which provides a particularly good exemplar to examine the contemporary challenges associated with the practical application of the biopsychosocial model. We conclude that a more optimal use of existing bodies of evidence, bringing together evidence-based methodological advances of the biopsychosocial model and existing evidence on the psychosocial needs associated with specific conditions/populations, can help to bridge the gap between philosophy and practice.
疾病如何被概念化的重要性在于,这样的定义对于理解与医疗工作相关的责任界限和范围至关重要。在本文中,我们旨在从哲学和实践层面概述这些理解在塑造医疗工作性质过程中的相互作用。我们首先讨论生物心理社会模型的出现,它既是对传统生物医学模型的挑战,也是对其的拓展。然后,我们概述与生物心理社会模型相关的主要批评,并指出一系列针对该模型最初形式的缺点所做出的贡献。尽管受到反复批评且应用情况参差不齐,但生物心理社会模型已进而影响了医学诸多领域的医疗实践、教育和研究的核心方面。其中一个领域是青少年医学,它为审视与生物心理社会模型实际应用相关的当代挑战提供了一个特别好的范例。我们得出结论,更优化地利用现有证据体系,将生物心理社会模型基于证据的方法进展与关于特定疾病/人群心理社会需求的现有证据结合起来,有助于弥合理论与实践之间的差距。