Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 20;18(11):2469. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112469.
In patients with glioblastoma, antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS). Especially in patients with an unusual infiltrative phenotype as seen in multifocal glioblastoma, the use of BEV therapy is still more controversial. Therefore, we prepared a retrospective case series with 16 patients suffering from a multifocal glioblastoma treated with BEV. We compared these patients to a matched control cohort of 16 patients suffering from glioblastoma with a single lesion treated with BEV. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the course of disease differs in glioblastoma patients with a multifocal disease pattern compared to those with a single lesion only. Patients were treated with BEV monotherapy or BEV in combination with irinotecan or lomustine (CCNU). Response rates and PFS were similar in both groups. There was a trend for an unfavorable OS in the patient group with multifocal glioblastoma, which was expected due to the generally worse prognosis of multifocal glioblastoma. We investigated whether BEV therapy affects the invasive growth pattern as measured by the appearance of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under BEV therapy, there was a trend for a lower frequency of new lesions both in multifocal and solitary glioblastoma. Based on these results, BEV therapy at relapse appears to be justified to no lesser extent in multifocal glioblastoma than in solitary glioblastoma.
在胶质母细胞瘤患者中,贝伐单抗(bevacizumab,BEV)的抗血管生成治疗已被证明可以改善无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),但不能改善总生存期(overall survival,OS)。特别是在多灶性胶质母细胞瘤中出现的异常浸润表型患者中,BEV 治疗的使用仍然存在更多争议。因此,我们准备了一项回顾性病例系列研究,纳入了 16 例接受 BEV 治疗的多灶性胶质母细胞瘤患者。我们将这些患者与 16 例接受 BEV 治疗的单灶性胶质母细胞瘤患者进行匹配对照。本研究的目的是评估多灶性疾病模式的胶质母细胞瘤患者与仅有单灶性病变的患者相比,疾病进程是否存在差异。患者接受 BEV 单药治疗或 BEV 联合伊立替康或洛莫司汀(lomustine,CCNU)治疗。两组的缓解率和 PFS 相似。多灶性胶质母细胞瘤患者的 OS 较差,这是预期的,因为多灶性胶质母细胞瘤的总体预后较差,这一趋势存在。我们研究了 BEV 治疗是否会影响侵袭性生长模式,方法是观察磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)上新病灶的出现。在 BEV 治疗下,多灶性和单灶性胶质母细胞瘤的新病灶频率均呈下降趋势。基于这些结果,在多灶性胶质母细胞瘤中,复发后接受 BEV 治疗与在单灶性胶质母细胞瘤中一样合理。