• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bevacizumab as a last-line treatment for glioblastoma following failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine.贝伐单抗作为放疗、替莫唑胺和洛莫司汀治疗失败后胶质母细胞瘤的一线治疗药物。
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):1141-1146. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6251. Epub 2017 May 25.
2
Survival benefits of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or temozolomide plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with glioblastoma aged ≥ 75 years.对于年龄≥75 岁的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者,低分割放疗联合替莫唑胺或替莫唑胺联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的生存获益。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 12;14(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1389-7.
3
Upfront bevacizumab may extend survival for glioblastoma patients who do not receive second-line therapy: an exploratory analysis of AVAglio.一线使用贝伐单抗可能会延长未接受二线治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存期:AVAglio研究的探索性分析
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Sep;18(9):1313-8. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now046. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.一项针对复发性胶质母细胞瘤成年患者的随机II期试验,比较标准剂量贝伐单抗与低剂量贝伐单抗加洛莫司汀(CCNU)的疗效。
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):487-494. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2195-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
5
Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in glioblastoma: a literature-based meta-analysis from 91 trials.无进展生存期作为胶质母细胞瘤总生存期的替代终点:基于91项试验的文献荟萃分析
Neuro Oncol. 2014 May;16(5):696-706. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not236. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
6
Long-term therapy with temozolomide is a feasible option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with as many as 101 temozolomide cycles.替莫唑胺长期治疗是新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的一种可行选择:一家机构多达101个替莫唑胺疗程的经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Dec;37(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.FOCUS14502.
7
A Randomized Phase II Trial (TAMIGA) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Bevacizumab Through Multiple Lines of Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.一项评估贝伐珠单抗连续用药治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效和安全性的随机 II 期临床试验(TAMIGA)。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):521-528. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0290. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Antiangiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma.高级别胶质瘤的抗血管生成治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 22(9):CD008218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008218.pub3.
9
Nivolumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma progressing on bevacizumab: a retrospective case series.纳武单抗用于贝伐单抗治疗后进展的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jul;133(3):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2466-0. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis.洛莫司汀联合贝伐单抗治疗胶质母细胞瘤的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 20;11:603947. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603947. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.贝伐单抗治疗胶质母细胞瘤的作用机制及研究进展
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):1874-1901. doi: 10.62347/RNUE7193. eCollection 2025.
2
A patient-derived xenograft mouse platform from epithelioid glioblastoma provides possible druggable screening and translational study.一个来自上皮样胶质母细胞瘤的患者来源异种移植小鼠平台为药物筛选和转化研究提供了可能。
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):4747-4759. doi: 10.62347/LQIJ5334. eCollection 2024.
3
Targeting the tumour vasculature: from vessel destruction to promotion.靶向肿瘤血管:从血管破坏到促进。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(10):655-675. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00736-0. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions.用于鉴别胶质瘤与治疗效果的先进磁共振成像方案:现状与未来方向
Front Radiol. 2022 Apr 15;2:809373. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2022.809373. eCollection 2022.
5
Bevacizumab is associated with cerebral microstructural alterations: a DTI study in high-grade glioma.贝伐单抗与脑微结构改变有关:一项高级别胶质瘤的扩散张量成像研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 May 25;14:1191226. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1191226. eCollection 2023.
6
Re-irradiation combined with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma beyond bevacizumab failure: survival outcomes and prognostic factors.贝伐珠单抗治疗失败后复发胶质母细胞瘤的再放疗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗:生存结果和预后因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):9442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36290-2.
7
Recognition and Management of the Long-term Effects of Cranial Radiation.识别和管理颅部放射治疗的长期效应。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):880-891. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01078-z. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Induction of Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma and Ovarian Cancers by a New Pyrrole Tubulin Assembly Inhibitor.新型吡咯烷类微管组装抑制剂诱导脑胶质瘤和卵巢癌细胞发生铁死亡。
J Med Chem. 2022 Dec 8;65(23):15805-15818. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01457. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Development of WRAP5 Peptide Complexes for Targeted Drug/Gene Co-Delivery toward Glioblastoma Therapy.用于靶向药物/基因共递送治疗胶质母细胞瘤的WRAP5肽复合物的研发。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Oct 18;14(10):2213. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102213.
10
Advances in Preclinical/Clinical Glioblastoma Treatment: Can Nanoparticles Be of Help?胶质母细胞瘤临床前/临床治疗进展:纳米颗粒能有所帮助吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 10;14(19):4960. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194960.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-irradiation for Recurrent Primary Brain Tumors.复发性原发性脑肿瘤的再照射
Anticancer Res. 2016 Oct;36(10):4985-4995. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11067.
2
Re-irradiation strategies in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent malignant glioma.联合贝伐单抗治疗复发性恶性胶质瘤的再照射策略
J Neurooncol. 2016 Dec;130(3):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2267-x. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.接受贝伐单抗治疗的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的预后因素。
J Neurooncol. 2016 Aug;129(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2144-7. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial.贝伐珠单抗联合伊立替康与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的 O6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA 甲基转移酶非甲基化胶质母细胞瘤:随机 GLARIUS 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
5
Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤
Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;134:381-97. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802997-8.00023-2.
6
Therapeutic options in recurrent glioblastoma--An update.复发性胶质母细胞瘤的治疗选择——最新进展
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Mar;99:389-408. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: A concise overview of the current literature.复发性胶质母细胞瘤的二次手术:当前文献综述
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;142:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Nitrosoureas in the Management of Malignant Gliomas.亚硝脲类药物在恶性脑胶质瘤治疗中的应用
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Feb;16(2):13. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0611-8.
9
Patients With Proneural Glioblastoma May Derive Overall Survival Benefit From the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: Retrospective Analysis of the AVAglio Trial.前体神经胶质母细胞瘤患者在一线放疗和替莫唑胺基础上加用贝伐单抗可能获得总生存获益:AVAglio试验的回顾性分析
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2735-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5005. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab or fotemustine for patients with progressive malignant gliomas.对于进展性恶性胶质瘤患者,采用大分割立体定向放射治疗联合贝伐单抗或福莫司汀的治疗方法。
J Neurooncol. 2015 May;122(3):559-66. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1745-x. Epub 2015 Feb 22.

贝伐单抗作为放疗、替莫唑胺和洛莫司汀治疗失败后胶质母细胞瘤的一线治疗药物。

Bevacizumab as a last-line treatment for glioblastoma following failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine.

作者信息

Wenger Katharina J, Wagner Marlies, You Se-Jong, Franz Kea, Harter Patrick N, Burger Michael C, Voss Martin, Ronellenfitsch Michael W, Fokas Emmanouil, Steinbach Joachim P, Bähr Oliver

机构信息

University Hospital and University Cancer Center, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):1141-1146. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6251. Epub 2017 May 25.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2017.6251
PMID:28693286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5494648/
Abstract

In previous trials, bevacizumab failed to prolong the overall survival time in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and at the first recurrence. Randomized clinical trials at the second or further recurrence following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, and retrospective analyses focusing on this specific cohort, are not yet available. A total of 62 patients with glioblastoma who received bevacizumab after the failure of standard care, including radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, previous treatment details, concomitant therapy, response based on the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times and rates were evaluated. Furthermore, the PFS and OS times and rates were analyzed for responders and non-responders. Of the patients, 54.8% (n=34) responded to treatment [complete response (CR) 3.2%, n=2; partial response (PR) 51.6%, n=32]. The median PFS time was 3.5 months and the median OS time was 7.5 months. The PFS rate at 6 months was 21.5% and the OS rate at 12 months was 11.5%. Responders (CR or PR) experienced a superior median PFS time compared with non-responders (i.e. stable or progressive disease; 5.4 vs. 1.9 months; P<0.0001) and a superior PFS rate at 6 months (34.9 vs. 7.1%; P<0.0001). The median OS time (8.6 vs. 6.4 months; P<0.0001) and OS rate at 12 months (21.3 vs. 0%; P<0.0001) were also superior in patients who exhibited a response to bevacizumab treatment. In conclusion, the objective response rate and the PFS and OS times and rates indicate that bevacizumab has activity in patients with glioblastoma following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide, and lomustine. A randomized trial comparing bevacizumab with best supportive care in these patients is advised.

摘要

在先前的试验中,贝伐单抗未能延长新诊断胶质母细胞瘤及首次复发时的总生存时间。对于放疗、替莫唑胺和洛莫司汀治疗失败后的第二次或更晚期复发情况,尚无随机临床试验,也没有针对这一特定队列的回顾性分析。我们回顾性确定了62例在标准治疗(包括放疗、替莫唑胺和洛莫司汀)失败后接受贝伐单抗治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者。评估了患者特征、既往治疗细节、伴随治疗、基于神经肿瘤学反应评估标准的反应情况、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)以及生存率。此外,还分析了反应者和无反应者的PFS和OS时间及生存率。在这些患者中,54.8%(n = 34)对治疗有反应[完全缓解(CR)3.2%,n = 2;部分缓解(PR)51.6%,n = 32]。中位PFS时间为3.5个月,中位OS时间为7.5个月。6个月时的PFS率为21.5%,12个月时的OS率为11.5%。与无反应者(即病情稳定或进展;5.4个月对1.9个月;P < 0.0001)相比,反应者(CR或PR)的中位PFS时间更长,6个月时的PFS率也更高(34.9%对7.1%;P < 0.0001)。对贝伐单抗治疗有反应的患者,其中位OS时间(8.6个月对6.4个月;P < 0.0001)和12个月时的OS率(21.3%对0%;P < 0.0001)也更高。总之,客观缓解率以及PFS和OS时间及生存率表明,贝伐单抗对放疗、替莫唑胺和洛莫司汀治疗失败后的胶质母细胞瘤患者有活性。建议在这些患者中开展一项比较贝伐单抗与最佳支持治疗的随机试验。