Suppr超能文献

接受贝伐单抗治疗的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的预后因素。

Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.

作者信息

Schaub Christina, Tichy Julia, Schäfer Niklas, Franz Kea, Mack Frederic, Mittelbronn Michel, Kebir Sied, Thiepold Anna-Luisa, Waha Andreas, Filmann Natalie, Banat Mohammed, Fimmers Rolf, Steinbach Joachim P, Herrlinger Ulrich, Rieger Johannes, Glas Martin, Bähr Oliver

机构信息

Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.

Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2016 Aug;129(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2144-7. Epub 2016 May 18.

Abstract

The value of bevacizumab (BEV) in recurrent glioblastoma is unclear. Imaging parameters and progression-free survival (PFS) are problematic endpoints. Few data exist on clinical factors influencing overall survival (OS) in unselected patients with recurrent glioblastoma exposed to BEV. We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with BEV at two German brain tumor centers. We evaluated general patient characteristics, MGMT status, pretreatment, concomitant oncologic treatment and overall survival. Karnofsky performance score, number of prior chemotherapies, number of prior recurrences and combined treatment with irinotecan (IRI) were significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis. We did not find differences in OS related to sex, age, histology, MGMT status, prior surgical treatment or number of prior radiotherapies. Combined treatment with IRI and higher KPS both remained significantly associated with prolonged survival in multivariate analysis, but patients receiving IRI co-treatment had less advanced disease. Grouping into clinically relevant categories revealed an OS of 16.9 months from start of BEV in patients with first recurrence and KPS ≥ 80 % (n = 25). In contrast, in patients with second recurrence and KPS < 80 %, OS was 3.6 months (n = 27). Our observational data support an early use of BEV in patients with good performance status. The benefit of co-treatment with IRI in our cohort seems to be the result of biased patient recruitment.

摘要

贝伐单抗(BEV)在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中的价值尚不清楚。影像学参数和无进展生存期(PFS)作为终点存在问题。关于影响接受BEV治疗的未选择的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者总生存期(OS)的临床因素的数据很少。我们回顾性分析了在两个德国脑肿瘤中心接受BEV治疗的174例复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者。我们评估了患者的一般特征、MGMT状态、预处理、同期肿瘤治疗和总生存期。在单因素分析中,卡诺夫斯基表现评分、既往化疗次数、既往复发次数以及与伊立替康(IRI)联合治疗与总生存期显著相关。我们未发现总生存期在性别、年龄、组织学、MGMT状态、既往手术治疗或既往放疗次数方面存在差异。在多因素分析中,与IRI联合治疗和较高的卡诺夫斯基表现评分均与生存期延长显著相关,但接受IRI联合治疗的患者疾病进展程度较低。按临床相关类别分组显示,首次复发且卡诺夫斯基表现评分≥80%的患者(n = 25)从开始使用BEV起的总生存期为16.9个月。相比之下,第二次复发且卡诺夫斯基表现评分<80%的患者,总生存期为3.6个月(n = 27)。我们的观察数据支持在性能状态良好的患者中早期使用BEV。在我们的队列中,与IRI联合治疗的益处似乎是患者招募存在偏差的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验