Liang Jing, Chen Yu-Hsin, Yan Wen-Jing, Qu Fangbing, Fu Xiaolan
a State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science , Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
b Department of Psychology , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Cogn Emot. 2018 Sep;32(6):1265-1274. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1404967. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Deception has been reported to be influenced by task-relevant emotional information from an external stimulus. However, it remains unclear how task-irrelevant emotional information would influence deception. In the present study, facial expressions of different valence and emotion intensity were presented to participants, where they were asked to make either truthful or deceptive gender judgments according to the preceding cues. We observed the influence of facial expression intensity upon individuals' cognitive cost of deceiving (mean difference of individuals' truthful and deceptive response times). Larger cost was observed for high intensity faces compared to low intensity faces. These results provided insights on how automatic attraction of attention evoked by task-irrelevant emotional information in facial expressions influenced individuals' cognitive cost of deceiving.
据报道,欺骗行为会受到来自外部刺激的与任务相关的情感信息的影响。然而,与任务无关的情感信息如何影响欺骗行为仍不清楚。在本研究中,向参与者展示了不同效价和情感强度的面部表情,要求他们根据之前的提示做出真实或欺骗性的性别判断。我们观察了面部表情强度对个体欺骗认知成本的影响(个体真实反应时间与欺骗反应时间的平均差异)。与低强度面部表情相比,高强度面部表情的认知成本更高。这些结果为面部表情中与任务无关的情感信息引发的注意力自动吸引如何影响个体的欺骗认知成本提供了见解。