Suppr超能文献

NRC 审查 EPA 甲醛的 IRIS 毒理学评价草案六年后:评估甲醛致癌性的新科学对法规的影响。

Six years after the NRC review of EPA's Draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Formaldehyde: Regulatory implications of new science in evaluating formaldehyde leukemogenicity.

机构信息

Environment and Health, Ramboll Environ, Amherst MA, United States.

Environment and Health, Ramboll Environ, Amherst MA, United States.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;92:472-490. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

Abstract

Shortly after the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) determined that formaldehyde causes leukemia, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its Draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Formaldehyde ("Draft IRIS Assessment"), also concluding that formaldehyde causes leukemia. Peer review of the Draft IRIS Assessment by a National Academy of Science committee noted that "causal determinations are not supported by the narrative provided in the draft" (NRC 2011). They offered recommendations for improving the Draft IRIS assessment and identified several important research gaps. Over the six years since the NRC peer review, significant new science has been published. We identify and summarize key recommendations made by NRC and map them to this new science, including extended analysis of epidemiological studies, updates of earlier occupational cohort studies, toxicological experiments using a sensitive mouse strain, mechanistic studies examining the role of exogenous versus endogenous formaldehyde in bone marrow, and several critical reviews. With few exceptions, new findings are consistently negative, and integration of all available evidence challenges the earlier conclusions that formaldehyde causes leukemia. Given formaldehyde's commercial importance, environmental ubiquity and endogenous production, accurate hazard classification and risk evaluation of whether exposure to formaldehyde from occupational, residential and consumer products causes leukemia are critical.

摘要

国际癌症研究机构(IARC)确定甲醛会导致白血病后不久,美国环境保护署(EPA)发布了其《甲醛的 IRIS 毒理学评估草案》(“草案 IRIS 评估”),也得出了甲醛会导致白血病的结论。美国国家科学院委员会对草案 IRIS 评估进行的同行评审指出,“在草案中提供的叙述中没有支持因果关系的确定”(NRC 2011)。他们提出了改进草案 IRIS 评估的建议,并确定了几个重要的研究空白。自 NRC 同行评审以来的六年中,已经发表了大量新的科学研究成果。我们确定并总结了 NRC 提出的关键建议,并将其映射到这些新的科学研究上,包括对流行病学研究的扩展分析、对早期职业队列研究的更新、使用敏感小鼠品系进行的毒理学实验、研究外源性和内源性甲醛在骨髓中作用的机制研究,以及几项关键综述。除了少数例外,新发现都是负面的,综合所有现有证据对甲醛会导致白血病的早期结论提出了挑战。鉴于甲醛的商业重要性、环境普遍性和内源性产生,准确的危险分类和评估接触职业、住宅和消费品中的甲醛是否会导致白血病的风险评估至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验