Wiseheart Rebecca, Altmann Lori J P
St. John's University, Communication Sciences and Disorders, Queens, NY, USA.
University of Florida, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Mar;53(2):355-369. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12353. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Individuals with dyslexia demonstrate syntactic difficulties on tasks of language comprehension, yet little is known about spoken language production in this population.
To investigate whether spoken sentence production in college students with dyslexia is less proficient than in typical readers, and to determine whether group differences can be attributable to cognitive differences between groups.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Fifty-one college students with and without dyslexia were asked to produce sentences from stimuli comprising a verb and two nouns. Verb types varied in argument structure and morphological form and nouns varied in animacy. Outcome measures were precision (measured by fluency, grammaticality and completeness) and efficiency (measured by response times). Vocabulary and working memory tests were also administered and used as predictors of sentence production performance.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Relative to non-dyslexic peers, students with dyslexia responded significantly slower and produced sentences that were significantly less precise in terms of fluency, grammaticality and completeness. The primary predictors of precision and efficiency were working memory, which differed between groups, and vocabulary, which did not.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: College students with dyslexia were significantly less facile and flexible on this spoken sentence-production task than typical readers, which is consistent with previous studies of school-age children with dyslexia. Group differences in performance were traced primarily to limited working memory, and were somewhat mitigated by strong vocabulary.
诵读困难症患者在语言理解任务中表现出句法困难,但对于该群体的口语表达情况却知之甚少。
调查患有诵读困难症的大学生在口语句子生成方面是否不如普通读者熟练,并确定群体差异是否可归因于两组之间的认知差异。
51名有或无诵读困难症的大学生被要求根据包含一个动词和两个名词的刺激物生成句子。动词类型在论元结构和形态形式上有所不同,名词在有生性上有所不同。结果测量指标为准确性(通过流畅性、语法正确性和完整性来衡量)和效率(通过反应时间来衡量)。还进行了词汇和工作记忆测试,并将其用作句子生成表现的预测指标。
与无诵读困难症的同龄人相比,患有诵读困难症的学生反应明显更慢,并且在流畅性、语法正确性和完整性方面生成的句子准确性明显更低。准确性和效率的主要预测指标是工作记忆(两组之间存在差异)和词汇(两组之间没有差异)。
患有诵读困难症的大学生在这项口语句子生成任务中的灵活性和熟练度明显低于普通读者,这与之前对患有诵读困难症的学龄儿童的研究结果一致。表现上的群体差异主要归因于工作记忆有限,而较强的词汇量在一定程度上缓解了这种差异。