• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读障碍中的句法歧义解决:对眼动差异和理解障碍背后认知因素的考察。

Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.

作者信息

Stella Marianna, Engelhardt Paul E

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):115-141. doi: 10.1002/dys.1613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1002/dys.1613
PMID:30990960
Abstract

This study examined eye movements and comprehension of temporary syntactic ambiguities in individuals with dyslexia, as few studies have focused on sentence-level comprehension in dyslexia. We tested 50 participants with dyslexia and 50 typically developing controls, in order to investigate (a) whether dyslexics have difficulty revising temporary syntactic misinterpretations and (b) underlying cognitive factors (i.e., working memory and processing speed) associated with eye movement differences and comprehension failures. In the sentence comprehension task, participants read subordinate-main structures that were either ambiguous or unambiguous, and we also manipulated the type of verb contained in the subordinate clause (i.e., reflexive or optionally transitive). Results showed a main effect of group on comprehension, in which individuals with dyslexia showed poorer comprehension than typically developing readers. In addition, participants with dyslexia showed longer total reading times on the disambiguating region of syntactically ambiguous sentences. With respect to cognitive factors, working memory was more associated with group differences than was processing speed. Conclusions focus on sentence-level syntactic processing issues in dyslexia (a previously under-researched area) and the relationship between online and offline measures of syntactic ambiguity resolution.

摘要

由于很少有研究关注阅读障碍患者的句子层面理解,本研究考察了阅读障碍患者对临时句法歧义的眼动情况及理解。我们测试了50名阅读障碍患者和50名发育正常的对照者,以调查:(a)阅读障碍患者在修正临时句法误解方面是否存在困难;(b)与眼动差异和理解失败相关的潜在认知因素(即工作记忆和处理速度)。在句子理解任务中,参与者阅读有歧义或无歧义的主从结构句子,我们还操纵了从句中所含动词的类型(即反身动词或可选及物动词)。结果显示,组别对理解有主效应,阅读障碍患者的理解能力比发育正常的读者差。此外,阅读障碍患者在句法歧义句子的歧义消解区域的总阅读时间更长。关于认知因素,工作记忆比处理速度与组别差异的关联更大。结论聚焦于阅读障碍中句子层面的句法处理问题(一个此前研究较少的领域)以及句法歧义消解的在线和离线测量之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.阅读障碍中的句法歧义解决:对眼动差异和理解障碍背后认知因素的考察。
Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):115-141. doi: 10.1002/dys.1613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
Sentence comprehension in young adults with developmental dyslexia.发展性阅读障碍青年的句子理解。
Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Dec;59(2):151-67. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0028-7. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
3
Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.儿童的阅读“足够好”吗?儿童阅读句法歧义句时在线加工与理解之间的联系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):855-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
4
Comprehension and Eye Movements in the Processing of Subject- and Object-Relative Clauses: Evidence from Dyslexia and Individual Differences.主语关系从句和宾语关系从句加工中的理解与眼动:来自阅读障碍及个体差异的证据
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 10;11(7):915. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070915.
5
Stimulating the brain's language network: syntactic ambiguity resolution after TMS to the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus.刺激大脑的语言网络:经颞叶下回和颞中回 TMS 后解决句法歧义。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Oct;25(10):1664-77. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00430. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.低阅读跨度和高阅读跨度读者在句子理解中句法歧义的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1562-75. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568479.
7
Use of Parsing Heuristics in the Comprehension of Passive Sentences: Evidence from Dyslexia and Individual Differences.解析启发式方法在被动句理解中的应用:来自阅读障碍及个体差异的证据。
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020209.
8
Syntactic and discourse skills in Chinese adolescent readers with dyslexia: a profiling study.中国青少年阅读障碍读者的句法和语篇能力:一项剖析研究。
Ann Dyslexia. 2014 Oct;64(3):222-47. doi: 10.1007/s11881-014-0095-2. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia.失语症患者在句子理解过程中韵律和词汇语义处理的电生理学。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Dec;107:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
10
A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.关于工作记忆和隐性韵律在解决附加语附着歧义中的分层线性建模分析。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Oct;38(5):491-509. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9102-x. Epub 2009 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Parsing Heuristics in the Comprehension of Passive Sentences: Evidence from Dyslexia and Individual Differences.解析启发式方法在被动句理解中的应用:来自阅读障碍及个体差异的证据。
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020209.
2
Are Linguistic Prediction Deficits Characteristic of Adults with Dyslexia?语言预测缺陷是成人阅读障碍者的特征吗?
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):59. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010059.
3
Developmental Dyslexia: Where Do We Go from Here?发育性阅读障碍:我们从这里走向何方?
Brain Sci. 2020 Mar 6;10(3):151. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10030151.