• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从纽伦堡到关塔那摩湾:医生在反恐战争中的作用

From Nuremberg to Guantanamo Bay: Uses of Physicians in the War on Terror.

作者信息

Crosby Sondra S, Benavidez Gilbert

机构信息

Sondra S. Crosby and Gilbert Benavidez are with the Center for Health Law, Ethics & Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan;108(1):36-41. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304154. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304154
PMID:29161065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5719692/
Abstract

Seventy years after the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial, health professionals and lawyers working together after 9/11 played a critical role in designing, justifying, and carrying out the US state-sponsored torture program in the CIA "Black Sites" and US military detention centers, including Abu Ghraib, Bagram, and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. We analyze the similarities between the Nazi doctors and health professionals in the War on Terror and address the question of how it happened that health professionals, including doctors, psychologists, physician assistants, and nurses, acted as agents of the state to utilize their medical and healing skills to cause harm and sanitize barbarous acts, similar to (though not on the scale of) how Nazi doctors were used by the Third Reich.

摘要

在纽伦堡医生审判70年后,9·11事件后共同合作的医疗专业人员和律师在设计、论证并实施美国政府支持的中情局“黑狱”及美国军事拘留中心(包括伊拉克的阿布格莱布监狱、阿富汗的巴格拉姆空军基地和古巴的关塔那摩湾拘留营)的酷刑计划中发挥了关键作用。我们分析了纳粹医生与反恐战争中的医疗专业人员之间的相似之处,并探讨了包括医生、心理学家、医师助理和护士在内的医疗专业人员如何成为政府的工具,利用他们的医疗和治愈技能造成伤害并为野蛮行为开脱,这与纳粹医生被第三帝国利用的情况类似(尽管规模不同)。

相似文献

1
From Nuremberg to Guantanamo Bay: Uses of Physicians in the War on Terror.从纽伦堡到关塔那摩湾:医生在反恐战争中的作用
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan;108(1):36-41. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304154. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
2
Doctors and torture.医生与酷刑。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048065.
3
First, do no harm: health professionals and Guantánamo.
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2007;37(3):733-48.
4
Glimpses of Guantanamo--medical ethics and the war on terror.关塔那摩一瞥——医学伦理与反恐战争
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2529-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058296.
5
Hunger strikers: ethical and legal dimensions of medical complicity in torture at Guantanamo Bay.绝食者:关塔那摩湾酷刑中医疗共谋的伦理和法律维度。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Dec;28(6):616-24. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008868. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Neglect of medical evidence of torture in Guantánamo Bay: a case series.关塔那摩湾酷刑医学证据遭忽视:病例系列。
PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1001027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001027. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
7
Doctors and interrogators at Guantanamo Bay.关塔那摩湾的医生和审讯人员。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 7;353(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058145. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
8
Doctors as pawns? Law and medical ethics at Guantánamo Bay.医生沦为棋子?关塔那摩湾的法律与医学伦理
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2007;37(3):711-31.
9
Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay detention centre and in the US military: a time for reform.关塔那摩湾拘留中心及美国军方的医学伦理:是时候进行改革了。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 25;374(9686):353-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60873-4.
10
The practice of torturing detainees in Guantanamo Bay.在关塔那摩湾对被拘留者实施酷刑的行为。
Mil Med. 2009 Dec;174(12):viii.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical challenges faced by French military doctors deployed in the Sahel (Operation Barkhane): a qualitative study.法国在萨赫勒地区(“巴尔赫内行动”)部署的军医所面临的伦理挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 19;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00723-2.
2
Thematic Analysis of Military Medical Ethics Publications From 2000 to 2020-A Bibliometric Approach.2000 年至 2020 年军事医学伦理出版物的主题分析——一种文献计量学方法。
Mil Med. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):e837-e845. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab317.
3
Nazi Medicine-Part 2: The Downfall of a Profession and Pernkopf's Anatomy Atlas.纳粹医学 - 第二部分:一个职业的衰落与佩恩科夫人体解剖图谱
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Nov;476(11):2123-2127. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000494.
4
Disturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".扰乱患者安全的规范 评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):867-869. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.26.
5
Reflections on the 70th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial.对纽伦堡医生审判70周年的反思。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan;108(1):10-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304203.

本文引用的文献

1
A Culture Of Health And Human Rights.健康与人权文化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1999-2004. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0700.
2
Force-feeding at Guantanamo.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):26. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103579. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Medical ethics and human rights in wartime.
S Afr Med J. 2015 Apr;105(4):240. doi: 10.7196/samj.9529.
4
Post-9/11 torture at CIA "black sites"--physicians and lawyers working together.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2279-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1503428.
5
Guantanamo Bay: a medical ethics-free zone?关塔那摩湾:一个没有医学伦理的区域?
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):101-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1306065. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.遭受大规模冲突和流离失所人群中,酷刑及其他潜在创伤性事件与心理健康结果的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
JAMA. 2009 Aug 5;302(5):537-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1132.
7
Lawyers will appeal ruling that cleared Guantanamo doctor of ethics violations.律师们将对一项宣告关塔那摩湾医生无违反道德行为的裁决提起上诉。
BMJ. 2005 Jul 23;331(7510):180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.180-b.
8
Doctors and torture.医生与酷刑。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048065.
9
The physical and psychological sequelae of torture. Symptomatology and diagnosis.
JAMA. 1988 May 13;259(18):2725-9.