• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管旁疝修补术的长期患者报告结局

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

作者信息

Lazar Damien J, Birkett Desmond H, Brams David M, Ford Heather A, Williamson Christina, Nepomnayshy Dmitry

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of General Surgery.

出版信息

JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00052.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2017.00052
PMID:29162971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5683814/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of consensus on the optimal repair technique and the definition of good outcomes in paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. We reviewed long-term patient-reported outcomes of open and laparoscopic PEH repair to assist with our future surgical consent process.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study including all patients with PEH repair performed from 2000 through 2012 at a single center without the use of mesh. We mailed questionnaires to patients to assess reoperation, symptom control, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Chart review identified 217 patients who underwent PEH repair. Nineteen died during the follow-up period. Of the 106 returning the questionnaire, 87 underwent laparoscopic repair, and 19 had open repair, with follow-up of 6.6 (SD 3.9) years and 7.0 (SD 4.1) years, respectively. Reoperation rates were 9.9% and 5.3%, respectively ( = .720). Dysphagia, heartburn, and regurgitation improved in 95.4% of patients after laparoscopic repair and 89.5% after open repair ( = .318). Medication for symptom control was necessary in 54.0% of patients after laparoscopic repair and 26.3% after open repair ( = .029). In each group, 90% stated that they would still choose to have the operation ( = .713).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term patient-specific outcomes showed comparable, encouraging results between open and laparoscopic repair of PEH without mesh reinforcement. However, half of those undergoing laparoscopic repair required the use of medication for symptom control. This study adds to the literature describing long-term patient-specific outcomes and can be useful when counseling patients about PEH repair.

摘要

背景与目的

对于食管旁疝(PEH)修复的最佳技术以及良好预后的定义,目前尚无共识。我们回顾了开放手术和腹腔镜手术修复PEH的长期患者报告结局,以辅助我们未来的手术知情同意过程。

方法

这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了2000年至2012年在单一中心接受PEH修复且未使用补片的所有患者。我们向患者邮寄问卷,以评估再次手术情况、症状控制及满意度。

结果

病历审查确定了217例接受PEH修复的患者。19例在随访期间死亡。在106例回复问卷的患者中,87例行腹腔镜修复,19例行开放修复,随访时间分别为6.6(标准差3.9)年和7.0(标准差4.1)年。再次手术率分别为9.9%和5.3%(P = 0.720)。腹腔镜修复后95.4%的患者吞咽困难、烧心和反流症状改善,开放修复后为89.5%(P = 0.318)。腹腔镜修复后54.0%的患者需要使用药物控制症状,开放修复后为26.3%(P = 0.029)。每组中,90%的患者表示仍会选择进行该手术(P = 0.713)。

结论

长期的患者特异性结局显示,在不使用补片加强的情况下,开放手术和腹腔镜手术修复PEH的结果具有可比性且令人鼓舞。然而,接受腹腔镜修复的患者中有一半需要使用药物控制症状。本研究补充了描述长期患者特异性结局的文献,在为患者提供PEH修复咨询时可能会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a090/5683814/d5df4ab78420/jls020163661001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a090/5683814/d5df4ab78420/jls020163661001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a090/5683814/d5df4ab78420/jls020163661001a.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.食管旁疝修补术的长期患者报告结局
JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00052.
2
Combination of Surgical Technique and Bioresorbable Mesh Reinforcement of the Crural Repair Leads to Low Early Hernia Recurrence Rates with Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中采用手术技术联合可吸收补片加强腹股沟修补可降低早期疝复发率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1477-1481. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04358-y. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Biological Mesh Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: An Analysis of Our Outcomes.食管旁疝的生物补片修复:我们的结果分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Nov;29(11):1446-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0423. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
Primary paraesophageal hernia repair with Gore® Bio-A® tissue reinforcement: long-term outcomes and association of BMI and recurrence.Gore® Bio-A® 组织加强物在原发性食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用:长期结果及 BMI 和复发的相关性。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4506-4516. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6200-6. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
Mesh cruroplasty in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias is not associated with better long-term outcomes compared to primary repair.与初次修复相比,腹腔镜下食管旁疝修补术中使用补片进行股疝修补术并不能带来更好的长期效果。
Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):651-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
6
Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加或不加补片后患者满意度、生活质量和客观复发率相同。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3673-3680. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
7
Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后的长期生活质量和复发风险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):424-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25.
8
Simple suture or prosthesis hiatal closure in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中单纯缝合或假体悬闭:一项回顾性队列研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Feb;24(2):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01094.x.
9
Outcomes after Laparoscopic Gastropexy as an Alternative for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜胃固定术作为治疗食管旁疝的一种替代方法的结果。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00059.
10
Paraesophageal hernia repair in the emergency setting: is laparoscopy with the addition of a fundoplication the new gold standard?急诊情况下的食管旁疝修补术:添加胃底折叠术的腹腔镜手术是新的金标准吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1790-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4447-8. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term durability and temporal pattern of revisional surgery of laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术翻修手术的长期耐久性和时间模式
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02070-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Robotic Repair of a Paraesophageal Hernia After an Open Nissen Fundoplication: Case Presentation and Clinical Discussion.开放性Nissen胃底折叠术后食管旁疝的机器人修复:病例报告与临床讨论
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64757. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64757. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Robotic hiatal hernia repair without mesh.

本文引用的文献

1
The Optimal Approach to Symptomatic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Important Technical Considerations.症状性食管旁疝修补的最佳方法:重要的技术考量
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):53. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0529-6.
2
Surgical Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernias: A Review.食管旁疝的外科治疗:综述
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Oct;26(10):778-783. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0332. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair.
无补片机器人食管裂孔疝修补术
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):175-182. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-753. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
A protocol for developing core outcome sets for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术核心结局集制定方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):907. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06845-1.
5
What Is the Reality of Hiatal Hernia Management?-A Registry Analysis.食管裂孔疝管理的现状如何?——一项注册研究分析。
Front Surg. 2020 Oct 22;7:584196. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584196. eCollection 2020.
6
Surgical and clinical outcomes comparison of mesh usage in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中使用补片的手术和临床结果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2724-2730. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07703-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
腹腔镜治疗大型食管裂孔疝:五年队列研究及网片增强与标准脚修复的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5404-5409. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4897-7. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术中补片与缝合修复盆底成形术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Surg. 2016 Jan;211(1):226-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
5
Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术中补片的应用:一项荟萃分析及风险效益分析
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0139547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139547. eCollection 2015.
6
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.腹腔镜下食管旁疝修补术
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00009.
7
Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝:缝线修补与可吸收补片修补及不可吸收补片修补的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000842.
8
Systematic review: questionnaires for assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.系统评价:用于评估胃食管反流病的问卷
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Feb-Mar;28(2):105-20. doi: 10.1111/dote.12163. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Open versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.开放性与腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术
JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):23-9. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13517013316951.
10
The choice of primary repair or mesh repair for paraesophageal hernia: a decision analysis based on utility scores.食管裂孔疝行原发性修补术还是网片修补术:基于效用评分的决策分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):655-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182822c8c.