Dinov Martin, Leech Robert
Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, The Centre for Restorative Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;11:534. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00534. eCollection 2017.
Part of the process of EEG microstate estimation involves clustering EEG channel data at the global field power (GFP) maxima, very commonly using a modified K-means approach. Clustering has also been done deterministically, despite there being uncertainties in multiple stages of the microstate analysis, including the GFP peak definition, the clustering itself and in the post-clustering assignment of microstates back onto the EEG timecourse of interest. We perform a fully probabilistic microstate clustering and labeling, to account for these sources of uncertainty using the closest probabilistic analog to KM called Fuzzy C-means (FCM). We train softmax multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) using the KM and FCM-inferred cluster assignments as target labels, to then allow for probabilistic labeling of the full EEG data instead of the usual correlation-based deterministic microstate label assignment typically used. We assess the merits of the probabilistic analysis vs. the deterministic approaches in EEG data recorded while participants perform real or imagined motor movements from a publicly available data set of 109 subjects. Though FCM group template maps that are almost topographically identical to KM were found, there is considerable uncertainty in the subsequent assignment of microstate labels. In general, imagined motor movements are less predictable on a time point-by-time point basis, possibly reflecting the more exploratory nature of the brain state during imagined, compared to during real motor movements. We find that some relationships may be more evident using FCM than using KM and propose that future microstate analysis should preferably be performed probabilistically rather than deterministically, especially in situations such as with brain computer interfaces, where both training and applying models of microstates need to account for uncertainty. Probabilistic neural network-driven microstate assignment has a number of advantages that we have discussed, which are likely to be further developed and exploited in future studies. In conclusion, probabilistic clustering and a probabilistic neural network-driven approach to microstate analysis is likely to better model and reveal details and the variability hidden in current deterministic and binarized microstate assignment and analyses.
脑电图微状态估计过程的一部分涉及在全局场功率(GFP)最大值处对脑电图通道数据进行聚类,非常普遍的做法是使用改进的K均值方法。尽管微状态分析的多个阶段存在不确定性,包括GFP峰值定义、聚类本身以及聚类后将微状态重新分配到感兴趣的脑电图时间进程中,但也有采用确定性聚类的情况。我们进行了完全概率性的微状态聚类和标记,使用与K均值最接近的概率类似物模糊C均值(FCM)来考虑这些不确定性来源。我们使用K均值和FCM推断的聚类分配作为目标标签来训练softmax多层感知器(MLP),以便对整个脑电图数据进行概率性标记,而不是通常使用的基于相关性的确定性微状态标签分配。我们在参与者执行来自109名受试者的公开可用数据集中的真实或想象运动时记录的脑电图数据中,评估概率分析与确定性方法的优缺点。尽管发现FCM组模板图在地形上几乎与K均值相同,但在随后的微状态标签分配中存在相当大的不确定性。一般来说,想象运动在逐个时间点上的可预测性较低,这可能反映了与真实运动相比,想象期间大脑状态更具探索性的本质。我们发现,使用FCM可能比使用K均值更能明显体现某些关系,并建议未来的微状态分析最好采用概率性方法而非确定性方法,特别是在诸如脑机接口等情况下,在这些情况下,微状态模型的训练和应用都需要考虑不确定性。概率神经网络驱动的微状态分配具有我们已经讨论过的许多优点,这些优点可能会在未来的研究中得到进一步发展和利用。总之,概率性聚类和概率神经网络驱动的微状态分析方法可能会更好地建模并揭示当前确定性和二值化微状态分配及分析中隐藏的细节和变异性。