Thibaut Aurore, Russo Cristina, Hurtado-Puerto Aura Maria, Morales-Quezada Jorge Leon, Deitos Alícia, Petrozza John Christopher, Freedman Steven, Fregni Felipe
Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Coma Science Group, GIGA-Research, University and University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;8:576. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00576. eCollection 2017.
Chronic visceral pain (CVP) syndromes are persistently painful disorders with a remarkable lack of effective treatment options. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of different neuromodulation techniques in patients with CVP on cortical activity, through electreocephalography (EEG) and on pain perception, through clinical tests.
A pilot crossover randomized controlled study.
Out-patient.
Adults with CVP (>3 months).
Participants received four interventions in a randomized order: (1) transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) and active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined, (2) tPCS alone, (3) tDCS alone, and (4) sham condition. Resting state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and pain assessments were performed before and after each intervention. Results were compared with a cohort of 47 healthy controls.
We enrolled six patients with CVP for a total of 21 visits completed. Compared with healthy participants, patients with CVP showed altered cortical activity characterized by increased power in theta, alpha and beta bands, and a significant reduction in the alpha/beta ratio. Regarding tES, the combination of tDCS with tPCS had no effect on power in any of the bandwidths, nor brain regions. Comparing tPCS with tDCS alone, we found that tPCS induced higher increase in power within the theta and alpha bandwidths.
This study confirms that patients with CVP present abnormal EEG-indexed cortical activity compared with healthy controls. Moreover, we showed that combining two types of neurostimulation techniques had no effect, whereas the two interventions, when applied individually, have different neural signatures.
慢性内脏痛(CVP)综合征是持续性疼痛疾病,明显缺乏有效的治疗选择。本研究旨在通过脑电图(EEG)评估不同神经调节技术对CVP患者皮质活动的影响,并通过临床测试评估其对疼痛感知的影响。
一项先导性交叉随机对照研究。
门诊。
患有CVP(超过3个月)的成年人。
参与者按随机顺序接受四种干预:(1)经颅脉冲电流刺激(tPCS)与主动经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合,(2)单独tPCS,(3)单独tDCS,以及(4)假刺激条件。在每次干预前后进行静息态定量脑电图(qEEG)和疼痛评估。将结果与47名健康对照者组成的队列进行比较。
我们招募了6名CVP患者,共完成21次就诊。与健康参与者相比,CVP患者表现出皮质活动改变,其特征为θ波、α波和β波频段功率增加,α/β比值显著降低。关于经颅电刺激(tES),tDCS与tPCS联合对任何带宽或脑区的功率均无影响。将tPCS与单独的tDCS比较,我们发现tPCS在θ波和α波带宽内诱导的功率增加更高。
本研究证实,与健康对照者相比,CVP患者存在脑电图指标异常的皮质活动。此外,我们表明,两种神经刺激技术联合应用没有效果,而单独应用这两种干预措施具有不同的神经特征。