• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅直流电刺激、经颅脉冲电流刺激及其联合应用对慢性内脏痛患者脑振荡的影响:一项前瞻性交叉随机对照研究。

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation, and Their Combination on Brain Oscillations in Patients with Chronic Visceral Pain: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Thibaut Aurore, Russo Cristina, Hurtado-Puerto Aura Maria, Morales-Quezada Jorge Leon, Deitos Alícia, Petrozza John Christopher, Freedman Steven, Fregni Felipe

机构信息

Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Coma Science Group, GIGA-Research, University and University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;8:576. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00576. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2017.00576
PMID:29163341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5672558/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic visceral pain (CVP) syndromes are persistently painful disorders with a remarkable lack of effective treatment options. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of different neuromodulation techniques in patients with CVP on cortical activity, through electreocephalography (EEG) and on pain perception, through clinical tests.

DESIGN

A pilot crossover randomized controlled study.

SETTINGS

Out-patient.

SUBJECTS

Adults with CVP (>3 months).

METHODS

Participants received four interventions in a randomized order: (1) transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) and active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined, (2) tPCS alone, (3) tDCS alone, and (4) sham condition. Resting state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and pain assessments were performed before and after each intervention. Results were compared with a cohort of 47 healthy controls.

RESULTS

We enrolled six patients with CVP for a total of 21 visits completed. Compared with healthy participants, patients with CVP showed altered cortical activity characterized by increased power in theta, alpha and beta bands, and a significant reduction in the alpha/beta ratio. Regarding tES, the combination of tDCS with tPCS had no effect on power in any of the bandwidths, nor brain regions. Comparing tPCS with tDCS alone, we found that tPCS induced higher increase in power within the theta and alpha bandwidths.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that patients with CVP present abnormal EEG-indexed cortical activity compared with healthy controls. Moreover, we showed that combining two types of neurostimulation techniques had no effect, whereas the two interventions, when applied individually, have different neural signatures.

摘要

目的

慢性内脏痛(CVP)综合征是持续性疼痛疾病,明显缺乏有效的治疗选择。本研究旨在通过脑电图(EEG)评估不同神经调节技术对CVP患者皮质活动的影响,并通过临床测试评估其对疼痛感知的影响。

设计

一项先导性交叉随机对照研究。

地点

门诊。

受试者

患有CVP(超过3个月)的成年人。

方法

参与者按随机顺序接受四种干预:(1)经颅脉冲电流刺激(tPCS)与主动经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合,(2)单独tPCS,(3)单独tDCS,以及(4)假刺激条件。在每次干预前后进行静息态定量脑电图(qEEG)和疼痛评估。将结果与47名健康对照者组成的队列进行比较。

结果

我们招募了6名CVP患者,共完成21次就诊。与健康参与者相比,CVP患者表现出皮质活动改变,其特征为θ波、α波和β波频段功率增加,α/β比值显著降低。关于经颅电刺激(tES),tDCS与tPCS联合对任何带宽或脑区的功率均无影响。将tPCS与单独的tDCS比较,我们发现tPCS在θ波和α波带宽内诱导的功率增加更高。

结论

本研究证实,与健康对照者相比,CVP患者存在脑电图指标异常的皮质活动。此外,我们表明,两种神经刺激技术联合应用没有效果,而单独应用这两种干预措施具有不同的神经特征。

相似文献

1
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation, and Their Combination on Brain Oscillations in Patients with Chronic Visceral Pain: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Controlled Study.经颅直流电刺激、经颅脉冲电流刺激及其联合应用对慢性内脏痛患者脑振荡的影响:一项前瞻性交叉随机对照研究。
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;8:576. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00576. eCollection 2017.
2
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症患者语言和交流能力的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Effect of Neurostimulation on Chronic Pancreatic Pain: A Systematic Review.神经刺激对慢性胰腺炎疼痛的影响:一项系统评价。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Dec;27(8):1255-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
6
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
7
Distinct resting state neural activity in chronic pain patients who respond to transcranial electric stimulation for pain relief.对经颅电刺激缓解疼痛有反应的慢性疼痛患者存在不同的静息态神经活动。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 15;19:1546414. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1546414. eCollection 2025.
8
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.干预措施用于克罗恩病和炎症性肠病的腹痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):CD013531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013531.pub2.
9
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.
10
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)改善中风后患者的日常生活活动能力、身体功能和认知功能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 21;3(3):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct resting state neural activity in chronic pain patients who respond to transcranial electric stimulation for pain relief.对经颅电刺激缓解疼痛有反应的慢性疼痛患者存在不同的静息态神经活动。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 15;19:1546414. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1546414. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the Effects of Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation at Low Frequencies (0.5 to 5 Hz) on Corticospinal and Corticocortical Excitability.研究低频(0.5至5赫兹)阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激对皮质脊髓和皮质皮质兴奋性的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jun;62(6):e70092. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70092.
3
In search of a composite biomarker for chronic pain by way of EEG and machine learning: where do we currently stand?

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of brain oscillations across different electrode montages in transcranial pulsed current stimulation.经颅脉冲电流刺激中不同电极组合下的脑电振荡模式。
Neuroreport. 2017 May 24;28(8):421-425. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000772.
2
Waking EEG Cortical Markers of Chronic Pain and Sleepiness.慢性疼痛和嗜睡的清醒脑电图皮质标志物。
Pain Med. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):1921-1931. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw294.
3
Structural plasticity and reorganisation in chronic pain.慢性疼痛中的结构可塑性和重组。
通过脑电图和机器学习寻找慢性疼痛的复合生物标志物:我们目前的进展如何?
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 14;17:1186418. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1186418. eCollection 2023.
4
Time since onset might be of essence: A recommendation to assess the effects of combination of non-pharmacological neuromodulatory approaches at early stage since symptoms onset.发病后的时间可能至关重要:建议在症状出现后的早期阶段评估非药物神经调节方法联合使用的效果。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 30;14:1115370. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1115370. eCollection 2023.
5
Resting-state electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography as biomarkers of chronic pain: a systematic review.静息态脑电图和脑磁图作为慢性疼痛的生物标志物:系统综述。
Pain. 2023 Jun 1;164(6):1200-1221. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002825. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Neural correlates of N-back task performance and proposal for corresponding neuromodulation targets in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders.神经相关的 N-back 任务表现与精神和神经发育障碍的相应神经调节靶点的建议。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Oct;76(10):512-524. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13442. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
7
Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study.经颅脉冲电流刺激与经颅直流电刺激治疗意识障碍患者的比较:一项先导性、假刺激对照的交叉双盲研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 24;12(4):429. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040429.
8
The effect of combined transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on lower limb spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized and controlled clinical study.经颅脉冲电刺激联合经皮神经电刺激对痉挛型脑瘫患儿下肢痉挛的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02615-1.
9
Network Mapping of Connectivity Alterations in Disorder of Consciousness: Towards Targeted Neuromodulation.意识障碍中连接性改变的网络映射:迈向靶向神经调节
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 18;9(3):828. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030828.
10
Reduction of intra-abdominal pain through transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review.经颅直流电刺激减轻腹痛:一项系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017017.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Dec 15;18(1):20-30. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.162.
4
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗应用的循证指南。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
5
Neural signature of tDCS, tPCS and their combination: Comparing the effects on neural plasticity.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、经颅脉冲刺激(tPCS)及其联合刺激的神经特征:比较对神经可塑性的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jan 10;637:207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Duration Dependent Effects of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation (tPCS) Indexed by Electroencephalography.基于脑电图的经颅脉冲电流刺激(tPCS)的持续时间依赖性效应
Neuromodulation. 2016 Oct;19(7):679-688. doi: 10.1111/ner.12457. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
Modulation of Total Sleep Time by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对总睡眠时间的调节作用
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Sep;41(10):2577-86. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.65. Epub 2016 May 4.
8
Electroencephalographic Patterns in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature.慢性疼痛中的脑电图模式:文献系统综述
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149085. eCollection 2016.
9
Cortical neurostimulation for neuropathic pain: state of the art and perspectives.用于神经性疼痛的皮质神经刺激:现状与展望
Pain. 2016 Feb;157 Suppl 1:S81-S89. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000401.
10
Psychological Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Pain Rely on Expectation and Previous Experience.心理安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在疼痛方面依赖于期望和既往经历。
J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 31.