Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、经颅脉冲刺激(tPCS)及其联合刺激的神经特征:比较对神经可塑性的影响。

Neural signature of tDCS, tPCS and their combination: Comparing the effects on neural plasticity.

作者信息

Thibaut Aurore, Russo Cristina, Morales-Quezada Leon, Hurtado-Puerto Aura, Deitos Alícia, Freedman Steven, Carvalho Sandra, Fregni Felipe

机构信息

Spaulding-Labuschagne Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Coma Science Group, GIGA-Research, University and University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Spaulding-Labuschagne Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience-NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jan 10;637:207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

Abstract

Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are two noninvasive neuromodulatory brain stimulation techniques whose effects on human brain and behavior have been studied individually. In the present study we aimed to quantify the effects of tDCS and tPCS, individually and in combination, on cortical activity, sensitivity and pain-related assessments in healthy individuals in order to understand their neurophysiological mechanisms and potential applications in clinical populations. A total of 48 healthy individuals participated in this randomized double blind sham controlled study. Participants were randomized to receive a single stimulation session of either: active or sham tPCS and active or sham tDCS. Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), sensitivity and pain assessments were used before and after each stimulation session. We observed that tPCS had a higher effect on power, as compared to tDCS, in several bandwidths on various cortical regions: the theta band in the parietal region (p=0.021), the alpha band in the temporal (p=0.009), parietal (p=0.0063), and occipital (p<0.0001) regions. We found that the combination of tPCS and tDCS significantly decreased power in the low beta bandwidth of the frontal (p=0.0006), central (p=0.0001), and occipital (p=0.0003) regions, when compared to sham stimulation. Additionally, tDCS significantly increased power in high beta over the temporal (p=0.0015) and parietal (p=0.0007) regions, as compared to sham. We found no effect on sensitivity or pain-related assessments. We concluded that tPCS and tDCS have different neurophysiological mechanisms, elicit distinct signatures, and that the combination of the two leads to no effect or a decrease on qEEG power. Further studies are required to examine the effects of these techniques on clinical populations in which EEG signatures have been found altered.

摘要

经颅脉冲电流刺激(tPCS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是两种非侵入性神经调节脑刺激技术,它们对人脑和行为的影响已分别进行了研究。在本研究中,我们旨在量化tDCS和tPCS单独及联合应用对健康个体皮质活动、敏感性和疼痛相关评估的影响,以了解其神经生理机制及在临床人群中的潜在应用。共有48名健康个体参与了这项随机双盲假对照研究。参与者被随机分配接受以下单一刺激疗程之一:主动或假tPCS以及主动或假tDCS。在每个刺激疗程前后使用定量脑电图(qEEG)、敏感性和疼痛评估。我们观察到,与tDCS相比,tPCS在多个皮质区域的几个带宽上对功率有更高的影响:顶叶区域的θ波段(p = 0.021)、颞叶(p = 0.009)、顶叶(p = 0.0063)和枕叶(p < 0.0001)区域的α波段。我们发现,与假刺激相比,tPCS和tDCS联合应用显著降低了额叶(p = 0.0006)、中央(p = 0.0001)和枕叶(p = 0.0003)区域低β带宽的功率。此外,与假刺激相比,tDCS显著增加了颞叶(p = 0.0015)和顶叶(p = 0.0007)区域高β的功率。我们发现对敏感性或疼痛相关评估没有影响。我们得出结论,tPCS和tDCS具有不同的神经生理机制,引发不同的特征,并且两者联合应用对qEEG功率无影响或降低。需要进一步研究来检查这些技术对已发现脑电图特征改变的临床人群的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
tDCS for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review.经颅直流电刺激治疗抑郁症:一项综述
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;266(8):681-694. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0674-9. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验