Ansel Ashley, Rosenzweig Joshua P, Zisman Philip D, Gesundheit Beni
Rapo Yerapeh Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel.
Front Oncol. 2017 Nov 6;7:264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00264. eCollection 2017.
With the recent success of oncolytic viruses in clinical trials, efforts toward improved monitoring of the viruses and their mechanism have intensified. Four main gene expression strategies have been employed to date including: analyzing overall gene expression in tumor cells, looking at gene expression of a few specific genes in the tumor cells, focusing on gene expression of specific transgenes introduced into the virus, and following gene expression of certain viral genes. Each strategy presents certain advantages and disadvantages over the others. Various methods to organize the dysregulated genes into clusters have provided a window into the mechanism of action for these viruses. Methodologically, the combined approach of looking at both overall gene expression, the tumor cells and gene expression of viral genes, enables researchers to assess correlation between the introduction of the virus and the changes in the tumor. This would seem to be the most productive approach for future studies, providing much information on mechanism and timing.
随着溶瘤病毒在临床试验中取得的近期成功,加强对病毒及其作用机制监测的努力也在加大。迄今为止,主要采用了四种基因表达策略,包括:分析肿瘤细胞中的整体基因表达、观察肿瘤细胞中少数特定基因的基因表达、关注引入病毒中的特定转基因的基因表达以及追踪某些病毒基因的基因表达。每种策略相对于其他策略都有一定的优缺点。将失调基因组织成簇的各种方法为了解这些病毒的作用机制提供了一个窗口。从方法学上讲,同时观察肿瘤细胞的整体基因表达和病毒基因的基因表达的联合方法,使研究人员能够评估病毒引入与肿瘤变化之间的相关性。这似乎是未来研究最有成效的方法,可提供有关机制和时间的大量信息。