Suppr超能文献

伐昔洛韦预防与抢先治疗在巨细胞病毒阳性肾移植受者中的比较:一项随机临床试验 7 年后的长期结果。

Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy in Cytomegalovirus-Positive Renal Allograft Recipients: Long-term Results After 7 Years of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Department of Nephrology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Transplantation Center, Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2018 May;102(5):876-882. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The VIPP study compared valganciclovir prophylaxis with preemptive treatment regarding efficacy, safety, and long-term graft outcome in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive (R+) renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical study with a 12-month study phase and a follow-up of up to 84 months. Patients in the prophylaxis group received 2 × 450 mg/d oral valganciclovir for 100 days adjusted to renal function. Preemptive treatment with 2 × 900 mg/d valganciclovir was initiated at a viral load of 400 CMV copies/mL or greater (polymerase chain reaction) and maintained over ≥14 days, followed by secondary prophylaxis. Patients were stratified by donor CMV IgG serostatus (donor CMV IgG positive [D+]/R+, donor CMV IgG negative [D-]/R+).

RESULTS

The 12-month results were reported previously (Witzke et al Transplantation 2012). The intent-to-treat/safety population comprised 148 patients in the prophylaxis (61.5% D+/R+) and 151 patients in the preemptive group (52.3% D+/R+). Overall, 47% patients completed the follow-up. Significantly fewer patients in the prophylaxis compared with preemptive group experienced a CMV infection or disease up to month 84 (11.5%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.8-17.8%] vs 39.7%; 95% CI, 31.9-48.0%; P < 0.0001 and 4.7%; 95% CI, 1.9-9.5% vs 15.9%; 95% CI, 10.5-22.7%; P = 0.002). Incidences of graft loss (7.4% vs 8.6%), death (9.5% vs 11.3%), rejection (29.1% vs 28.5%), and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [mean ± SD]: 58.2 ± 26.3 vs 59.9 ± 25.7 mL/min per 1.73 m) were not significantly different between prophylaxis and preemptive treatment. Tolerability was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis was more effective than the preemptive approach, applying a low-intense surveillance protocol in preventing CMV infection and disease in intermediate-risk patients. Both strategies were similarly effective in preventing graft loss and death under the conditions of this long-term trial with a threshold of 400 copies/mL for initiation of anti-CMV treatment.

摘要

背景

VIPP 研究比较了更昔洛韦预防与抢先治疗在 CMV(巨细胞病毒)阳性(R+)肾移植受者中的疗效、安全性和长期移植物结局。

方法

这是一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验,研究阶段为 12 个月,随访时间长达 84 个月。预防组患者接受调整肾功能后的 2×450mg/d 口服缬更昔洛韦治疗 100 天。病毒载量为 400CMV 拷贝/mL 或更高时(聚合酶链反应)开始 2×900mg/d 缬更昔洛韦抢先治疗,并持续至少 14 天,随后进行二级预防。根据供体 CMV IgG 血清状态(供体 CMV IgG 阳性 [D+]/R+、供体 CMV IgG 阴性 [D-]/R+)对患者进行分层。

结果

12 个月的结果之前已经报告(Witzke 等人,移植 2012 年)。意向治疗/安全性人群包括预防组 148 例(61.5% D+/R+)和抢先治疗组 151 例(52.3% D+/R+)患者。总体而言,47%的患者完成了随访。与抢先治疗组相比,预防组至第 84 个月时发生 CMV 感染或疾病的患者明显更少(11.5%;95%置信区间[95%CI],6.8-17.8%)vs 39.7%;95%CI,31.9-48.0%;P<0.0001 和 4.7%;95%CI,1.9-9.5%)vs 15.9%;95%CI,10.5-22.7%;P=0.002)。移植物丢失(7.4% vs 8.6%)、死亡(9.5% vs 11.3%)、排斥(29.1% vs 28.5%)和肾功能(估计肾小球滤过率[平均值±标准差]:58.2±26.3 vs 59.9±25.7mL/min/1.73m)在预防组和抢先治疗组之间无显著差异。两组的耐受性相当。

结论

与抢先治疗相比,预防策略更有效,通过采用低强度监测方案,在预防中等风险患者的 CMV 感染和疾病方面更有效。在本长期试验中,启动抗 CMV 治疗的阈值为 400 拷贝/mL,两种策略在预防移植物丢失和死亡方面同样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验