• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后尿道悬吊术失败:一项病例对照尿动力学研究。

Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case-controlled urodynamic study.

作者信息

Bowen L W, Sand P K, Ostergard D R, Franti C E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;160(2):452-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90471-7.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90471-7
PMID:2916634
Abstract

A retrospective comparison was made of the urodynamic parameters of urethral sphincteric function of 21 women with failure of modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and 21 matched control subjects in whom operation was successful. The match criteria included multiple risk factors that contributed to the failure of antiincontinence surgery. The preoperative resting urethral closure pressure and urethral functional length were significantly lower in the study (failure) group than in the control (success) group. These parameters of intrinsic urethral function improved only in the control (success) group after operation. Further study showed that 17 of the 21 patients (81%) in the control (success) group had preoperative closure pressure greater than 20 cm H2O, whereas only five of the 21 patients (24%) in the study (failure) group had initial closure pressure higher than this value. Identification of a low-pressure urethra by preoperative urethral profilometry suggests a greatly increased risk for operative failure.

摘要

对21例改良Burch耻骨后尿道悬吊术失败的女性患者和21例手术成功的匹配对照者的尿道括约肌功能尿动力学参数进行回顾性比较。匹配标准包括导致抗尿失禁手术失败的多种风险因素。研究(失败)组术前静息尿道闭合压和尿道功能长度显著低于对照(成功)组。这些尿道固有功能参数仅在对照(成功)组术后得到改善。进一步研究表明,对照(成功)组21例患者中有17例(81%)术前闭合压大于20 cm H2O,而研究(失败)组21例患者中只有5例(24%)初始闭合压高于此值。术前尿道压力测定显示尿道压力低提示手术失败风险大大增加。

相似文献

1
Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case-controlled urodynamic study.耻骨后尿道悬吊术失败:一项病例对照尿动力学研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;160(2):452-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90471-7.
2
Role of urethral electromyography in predicting outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy.尿道肌电图在预测耻骨后尿道悬吊术结果中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):51-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116374.
3
A urodynamic appraisal of success and failure after retropubic urethropexy.
J Reprod Med. 1987 Sep;32(9):693-6.
4
[Changes in values of urethral closure pressure and its position after Burch colposuspension--predictive value of MUCP and VLPP for successful rate of this operation].[Burch阴道悬吊术后尿道闭合压及其位置的变化——最大尿道闭合压和腹压漏尿点压对该手术成功率的预测价值]
Ceska Gynekol. 2006 May;71(3):209-19.
5
Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for failed retropubic surgical procedure.女性低尿道压力与压力性尿失禁:耻骨后手术失败的危险因素。
Urology. 1990 Sep;36(3):245-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80265-o.
6
Bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence: how does it work?
Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(6):623-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1999)18:6<623::aid-nau12>3.0.co;2-5.
7
Urodynamic effects of retropublic urethropexy in genuine stress incontinence.耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗真性压力性尿失禁的尿动力学效应
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug 15;140(8):936-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90088-0.
8
Low valsalva leak-point pressure and success of retropubic urethropexy.低瓦尔萨尔瓦漏点压力与耻骨后尿道悬吊术的成功率
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/s001920170094.
9
The urethral closure function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry.通过尿道压力反射测定法评估控尿和压力性尿失禁女性的尿道闭合功能。
Dan Med J. 2014 Feb;61(2):B4795.
10
Urodynamic studies before and after retropubic urethropexy for stress incontinence in females.女性压力性尿失禁耻骨后尿道悬吊术前后的尿动力学研究
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Sep;155(3):333-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: tape tightening or repeat sling?经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术失败后复发性压力性尿失禁的治疗:吊带收紧还是再次吊带手术?
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep;23(9):1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1737-8. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
2
Predictive factors that influence treatment outcomes of innovative single incision sling: comparing TVT-Secur to an established transobturator sling for female stress urinary incontinence.影响创新单切口吊带治疗效果的预测因素:TVT-Secur与一种成熟的经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jul;23(7):907-12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1687-1. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
3
Preoperative urethral parameters at rest and objective cure following laparoscopic colposuspension.
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1034-3.
4
Predictors of treatment failure 24 months after surgery for stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁手术后24个月治疗失败的预测因素。
J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):1024-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.074. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
5
Opening vesical pressure: a new test to discriminate urethral sphincter deficiency?膀胱开放压:一种鉴别尿道括约肌功能不全的新测试?
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Dec;18(12):1435-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0379-8. Epub 2007 May 4.
6
Prospective randomized comparison of transobturator suburethral sling (Monarc) vs suprapubic arc (Sparc) sling procedures for female urodynamic stress incontinence.经闭孔尿道下吊带术(Monarc)与耻骨上弧形吊带术(Sparc)治疗女性尿动力学压力性尿失禁的前瞻性随机对照研究
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Sep;17(5):439-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-0035-0. Epub 2005 Dec 3.
7
Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jun;17(4):335-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-0006-5. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
8
Further characterization of the supine empty stress test for predicting low valsalva leak point pressures.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Sep-Oct;15(5):298-301. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1172-6. Epub 2004 Jun 4.
9
Effects of voluntary pelvic floor contraction and relaxation on the urethral closure pressure.自主盆底收缩与放松对尿道闭合压的影响。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):187-90; discussion 190-1. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1232-y. Epub 2004 Sep 22.
10
Is the leak point pressure alone an accurate indicator of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency?仅漏点压力是否是固有括约肌缺陷的准确指标?
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Sep-Oct;15(5):294-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1154-8. Epub 2004 Jul 8.