• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗真性压力性尿失禁的尿动力学效应

Urodynamic effects of retropublic urethropexy in genuine stress incontinence.

作者信息

Bhatia N N, Ostergard D R

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug 15;140(8):936-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90088-0.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(81)90088-0
PMID:7196695
Abstract

Literature reports of preoperative and postoperative urodynamic evaluations of women with genuine stress incontinence note a lack of effect of the surgical procedure on urethral functional length the closure pressure. This report indicates a different experience. Postoperative urodynamics 4 to 12 months following retropubic urethropexy in this group of patients demonstrated consistent and significant increases in urethral functional length and closure pressure with different patient positions and bladder volumes, when compared to preoperative studies. Postoperative stress testing also became normal. This augmentation of normal urethral function is most likely due to avoidance of midline periurethral dissection, which allows the normal urethra and urethrovesical junction to augment their functional capabilities unencumbered by iatrogenic periurethral scarification.

摘要

关于真性压力性尿失禁女性患者术前和术后尿动力学评估的文献报道指出,手术操作对尿道功能长度和闭合压力没有影响。本报告显示了不同的情况。与术前研究相比,该组患者耻骨后尿道悬吊术后4至12个月的术后尿动力学检查表明,在不同的患者体位和膀胱容量下,尿道功能长度和闭合压力持续且显著增加。术后压力测试也恢复正常。正常尿道功能的这种增强很可能是由于避免了中线尿道周围剥离,这使得正常尿道和尿道膀胱交界处能够不受医源性尿道周围瘢痕形成的阻碍而增强其功能。

相似文献

1
Urodynamic effects of retropublic urethropexy in genuine stress incontinence.耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗真性压力性尿失禁的尿动力学效应
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug 15;140(8):936-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90088-0.
2
Role of urethral electromyography in predicting outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy.尿道肌电图在预测耻骨后尿道悬吊术结果中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):51-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116374.
3
Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for failed retropubic surgical procedure.女性低尿道压力与压力性尿失禁:耻骨后手术失败的危险因素。
Urology. 1990 Sep;36(3):245-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80265-o.
4
Urodynamics in women with stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁女性的尿动力学
Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov;60(5):552-9.
5
The prognostic significance of augmentation of urethral closure pressure and functional length.尿道闭合压及功能长度增加的预后意义
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990 Oct;33(2):135-9. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(90)90586-a.
6
The effect of retropubic urethropexy on detrusor stability.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;71(6 Pt 1):818-22.
7
Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case-controlled urodynamic study.耻骨后尿道悬吊术失败:一项病例对照尿动力学研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;160(2):452-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90471-7.
8
Urodynamic studies before and after retropubic urethropexy for stress incontinence in females.女性压力性尿失禁耻骨后尿道悬吊术前后的尿动力学研究
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Sep;155(3):333-6.
9
A urodynamic appraisal of success and failure after retropubic urethropexy.
J Reprod Med. 1987 Sep;32(9):693-6.
10
Urodynamic investigation of women operated on for genuine stress incontinence.对因真性压力性尿失禁接受手术治疗的女性进行尿动力学研究。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48(4):263-6. doi: 10.1159/000010196.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of the tension-free vaginal tape on voiding function: a prospective evaluation.无张力阴道吊带对排尿功能的影响:一项前瞻性评估。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Jan-Feb;15(1):32-8; discussion 38. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1098-4. Epub 2003 Nov 25.
2
Follow-up of a new modification of the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz (MMK) procedure.马歇尔-马凯蒂-克兰茨(MMK)手术新改良术式的随访
Arch Gynecol. 1986;239(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02134281.
3
Urodynamic studies before and after retropubic colpo-urethrocystopexy in fertile women with stress urinary incontinence.
压力性尿失禁的育龄女性耻骨后阴道尿道膀胱悬吊术前后的尿动力学研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1988;241(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00931351.