Suppr超能文献

在长白猪/大白猪静脉注射咪达唑仑后使用瑞芬太尼诱导麻醉。

Induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil after bolus midazolam administration in Landrace/Large White swine.

作者信息

Zacharioudaki Argyro, Lelovas Pavlos, Sergentanis Theodoros N, Karlis George, Hansen Axel K, Papalois Apostolos, Xanthos Theodoros

机构信息

Experimental Research Center, ELPEN Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Pikermi, Attica, Greece.

MSc Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 Nov;44(6):1353-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate an alternative combination for anaesthesia induction in swine.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, 'blinded' experimental study.

ANIMALS

Forty-five Landrace/Large White swine weighing 20.0±1.5 kg.

METHODS

Pulse oximetry, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were measured after premedication with ketamine, midazolam and atropine as well as after intubation following induction with a fixed dose of 0.2 mg kg midazolam combined with 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 μg kg remifentanil (groups R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5, respectively). Intubation was evaluated using a numerical scoring system assessing jaw relaxation, resistance to the laryngoscope, vocal cord position, vocal cord movement and response to intubation. The time required to intubate and necessity for an additional midazolam dose were recorded. Baseline and post-intubation variables were compared with paired t tests, whereas for differences between the remifentanil groups the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was estimated. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to disentangle the effect of remifentanil dose and the additional midazolam.

RESULTS

Higher dose of remifentanil was associated with better vocal cord position (p<0.001), better response to intubation (p<0.001), shorter time required for intubation (p=0.030) and less frequent necessity for additional administration of midazolam (p=0.004). In total, 39.5% of the animals required additional midazolam. In groups R1, R4 and R5, there were decreases in HRs (p=0.009, p=0.008 and p=0.032, respectively) between baseline and post-intubation phase; in groups R3 and R4, there were decreases in systolic blood pressure (p=0.040 and p=0.019, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, remifentanil dose was not associated with the observed changes in haemodynamic variables. One animal developed apnoea and four electrocardiographic anomalies; all resolved without pharmaceutical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A combination of 0.2 mg kg midazolam with 4 or 5 μg kg remifentanil may provide an alternative method of anaesthesia induction for swine.

摘要

目的

研究猪麻醉诱导的另一种联合用药方案。

研究设计

随机、“盲法”实验研究。

动物

45头体重20.0±1.5千克的长白猪/大白猪。

方法

在使用氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和阿托品进行术前用药后,以及使用固定剂量的0.2毫克/千克咪达唑仑联合1、2、3、4或5微克/千克瑞芬太尼诱导插管后(分别为R1、R2、R3、R4和R5组),测量脉搏血氧饱和度、心率(HR)和血压。使用数字评分系统评估插管情况,该系统评估下颌松弛度、喉镜插入阻力、声带位置、声带运动和对插管的反应。记录插管所需时间和额外使用咪达唑仑剂量的必要性。使用配对t检验比较基线和插管后的变量,而对于瑞芬太尼组之间的差异,估计Spearman等级相关系数。进行多变量回归分析以阐明瑞芬太尼剂量和额外使用咪达唑仑的影响。

结果

较高剂量的瑞芬太尼与更好的声带位置(p<0.001)、更好的插管反应(p<0.001)、更短的插管时间(p=0.030)以及额外使用咪达唑仑的频率更低(p=0.004)相关。总共39.5%的动物需要额外使用咪达唑仑。在R1、R4和R5组中,基线和插管后阶段之间心率下降(分别为p=0.009、p=0.008和p=0.032);在R3和R4组中,收缩压下降(分别为p=0.040和p=0.019)。在多变量分析中,瑞芬太尼剂量与观察到的血流动力学变量变化无关。1只动物出现呼吸暂停,4只出现心电图异常;所有异常均未进行药物干预即自行缓解。

结论及临床意义

0.2毫克/千克咪达唑仑与4或5微克/千克瑞芬太尼联合使用可能为猪提供一种替代的麻醉诱导方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验