Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30460-8042 USA.
Am J Bot. 2017 Nov;104(11):1756-1764. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700178.
A repeated pattern of American amphitropical disjunct species or sister species distributed on either side of the equator has long-fascinated botanists, but the modes of these disjunctions remain untested. We evaluated diaspore morphology to generate hypotheses on probable dispersal mechanisms.
The sizes and structures of diaspores, habit, habitat, distribution, and dispersal units were collected for 108 species from literature searches and herbarium specimens. Variation was evaluated with summary statistics, χ tests with Monte Carlo simulations, ANOVAs, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test.
Seeds were the dispersing diaspore in 38.0% of the species, 45.4 were dispersed as fruits, and the remaining were dispersed as infructescences or spores. Diaspores were epizoochorous (52.8%), anemochorous (20.4%), achorous (15.7%), endozoochorous (8.3%), and hydrochorous (2.8%). Epizoochory was significantly greater than expected. Zoochory occurred more frequently than expected when considering achorous diaspores as animal-dispersed. Most species were associated with wetland, woodland, and grassland habitats. An ANOVA revealed that diaspores associated with hydrochory were larger and anemochory was smaller; all other syndromes were not significantly different.
Botanists have long-held the assumption that bird migrations are responsible for amphitropical disjunctions. Our results support this hypothesis, with the majority of these events occurring by external attachment of small fruits. However, our results also indicate that anemochory might play a greater role in producing amphitropical distributions than previously thought and at a greater rate than endozoochory or hydrochory.
长期以来,美国跨热带间断分布的物种或姐妹种的重复模式一直吸引着植物学家的注意,但这些间断的模式仍未得到验证。我们评估了种皮形态,以产生关于可能的扩散机制的假说。
从文献检索和标本中收集了 108 种植物的种皮大小和结构、习性、生境、分布和扩散单位。使用汇总统计、带有蒙特卡罗模拟的 χ 检验、方差分析和非参数曼-惠特尼检验评估了变异。
在 38.0%的物种中,种子是传播种皮,45.4%的物种是作为果实传播的,其余的是作为果实或孢子传播的。种皮是外生动物传播(52.8%)、风传播(20.4%)、无动物传播(15.7%)、内生动物传播(8.3%)和水生传播(2.8%)。外生动物传播的比例明显高于预期。当考虑无动物传播的种皮为动物传播时,动物传播的比例高于预期。大多数物种与湿地、林地和草地生境有关。方差分析表明,与水生传播相关的种皮较大,与风传播相关的种皮较小;其他所有综合征没有显著差异。
植物学家长期以来一直认为鸟类迁徙是造成跨热带间断分布的原因。我们的结果支持这一假说,大多数此类事件是通过小果实的外部附着发生的。然而,我们的结果也表明,与内生动物传播或水生传播相比,风传播可能在产生跨热带分布方面发挥更大的作用,而且速度更快。