Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01576-17. Print 2018 Feb.
If a bone or joint infection is suspected, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is frequently withheld until intraoperative microbiological sampling has been performed. This practice builds upon the hypothesis that perioperative antibiotics could render culture results negative and thus impede tailored antibiotic treatment of infections. We aimed to assess the influence of antibiotic prophylaxis within 30 to 60 min before surgery on time to positivity of microbiological samples and on proportion of positive samples in bone and joint infections. Patients with at least one sample positive for between January 2005 and December 2015 were included and classified as having an "infection" if at least 2 samples were positive; otherwise they were considered to have a sample "contamination." Kaplan-Meier curves were used to illustrate time to culture positivity. We found 64 cases with a infection and 46 classified as having a contamination. Application of perioperative prophylaxis significantly differed between the infection and contamination groups (72.8% versus 55.8%; < 0.001). Within the infection group, we found no difference in time to positivity between those who had or had not received a perioperative prophylaxis (7.07 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4 to 7.7, versus 7.11 days; 95% CI, 6.8 to 7.5; = 0.3). Also, there was no association between the proportion of sample positivity and the application of perioperative prophylaxis (71.6% versus 65.9%; = 0.39). Since perioperative prophylaxis did not negatively influence the microbiological yield in infections, antibiotic prophylaxis can be routinely given to avoid surgical site infections.
如果怀疑有骨或关节感染,通常会在术中进行微生物取样后才开始使用围手术期抗生素预防。这种做法基于以下假设:围手术期使用抗生素可能会使培养结果呈阴性,从而阻碍针对感染的针对性抗生素治疗。我们旨在评估手术前 30 至 60 分钟内使用抗生素预防对微生物样本阳性时间和骨与关节感染样本阳性比例的影响。
本研究纳入了 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月间至少有一个样本阳性的患者,如果至少有 2 个样本阳性,则将其归类为“感染”;否则,将其归类为样本“污染”。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线说明培养阳性的时间。我们发现 64 例感染患者和 46 例污染患者。感染组和污染组之间的围手术期预防应用有显著差异(72.8%与 55.8%;<0.001)。在感染组中,我们发现接受或未接受围手术期预防的患者之间的阳性时间无差异(7.07 天;95%置信区间[CI],6.4 至 7.7,与 7.11 天;95%CI,6.8 至 7.5;=0.3)。此外,样本阳性比例与围手术期预防应用之间也没有关联(71.6%与 65.9%;=0.39)。由于围手术期预防并没有对感染患者的微生物产量产生负面影响,因此可以常规使用抗生素预防来避免手术部位感染。