• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解单核苷酸多态性:女性对获取个人乳腺癌风险概况的理解与经历

Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.

作者信息

Young Mary-Anne, Forrest Laura Elenor, Rasmussen Victoria-Mae, James Paul, Mitchell Gillian, Sawyer Sarah Dilys, Reeve Katrina, Hallowell Nina

机构信息

The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.

Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):702-708. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z
PMID:29168041
Abstract

Genome wide association studies have identified a number of common genetic variants - single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - that combine to increase breast cancer risk. SNP profiling may enhance the accuracy of risk assessment and provides a personalized risk estimate. SNP testing for breast cancer risks may supplement other genetic tests in the future, however, before it can be implemented in the clinic we need to know how it will be perceived and received. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 39 women who had previously had a breast cancer diagnosis and undergone BRCA1/2 testing, participated in the Variants in Practice (ViP) study and received personalized risk (SNP) profiles. Interviews explored their understanding and experiences of receiving this SNP information. Women reported feeling positive about receiving their personalized risk profile, because it: provided an explanation for their previous diagnosis of cancer, vindicated previous risk management decisions and clarified their own and other family members' risks. A small group was initially shocked to learn of the increased risk of a second primary breast cancer. This study suggests that the provision of personalized risk information about breast cancer generated by SNP profiling is understood and well received. However, a model of genetic counseling that incorporates monogenic and polygenic genetic information will need to be developed prior to clinical implementation.

摘要

全基因组关联研究已经确定了一些常见的基因变异——单核苷酸多态性(SNP)——这些变异共同作用会增加患乳腺癌的风险。SNP分析可能会提高风险评估的准确性,并提供个性化的风险估计。未来,用于评估乳腺癌风险的SNP检测可能会补充其他基因检测,然而,在其能够应用于临床之前,我们需要了解它将如何被看待和接受。我们对39名曾被诊断患有乳腺癌并接受过BRCA1/2检测、参与了“实践中的变异”(ViP)研究并收到个性化风险(SNP)分析报告的女性进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈探讨了她们对收到这种SNP信息的理解和体验。女性报告称,她们对收到个性化风险分析报告感觉良好,因为它:为她们之前的癌症诊断提供了解释,证明了之前风险管理决策的合理性,并明确了她们自己以及其他家庭成员的风险。一小部分人最初得知患第二原发性乳腺癌的风险增加时感到震惊。这项研究表明,由SNP分析生成的关于乳腺癌的个性化风险信息能够被理解且受到好评。然而,在临床应用之前,需要开发一种整合单基因和多基因遗传信息的遗传咨询模式。

相似文献

1
Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.理解单核苷酸多态性:女性对获取个人乳腺癌风险概况的理解与经历
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):702-708. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.通过单核苷酸多态性检测评估乳腺癌风险实现个性化医疗:临床应用
J Genet Couns. 2015 Oct;24(5):744-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9803-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
Women's responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information.女性对多基因乳腺癌风险信息的反应和理解。
Fam Cancer. 2020 Oct;19(4):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10689-020-00185-2.
4
Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.关于采用预测试教育方法以增强BRCA1基因检测知情决策的对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 15;89(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148.
5
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.
6
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.
7
Influence of lived experience on risk perception among women who received a breast cancer polygenic risk score: 'Another piece of the pie'.经历对接受乳腺癌多基因风险评分女性风险感知的影响:“另一块馅饼”。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Jun;30(3):849-860. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1384. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Psychosocial and behavioral impact of breast cancer risk assessed by testing for common risk variants: protocol of a prospective study.通过检测常见风险变异评估乳腺癌风险的心理社会和行为影响:一项前瞻性研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3485-0.
9
Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field.多基因乳腺癌风险的临床应用:新兴领域的批判性评价与展望。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Feb 17;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01260-3.
10
Addition of a 161-SNP polygenic risk score to family history-based risk prediction: impact on clinical management in non- breast cancer families.添加基于 161-SNP 多基因风险评分的家族史风险预测:对非乳腺癌家族临床管理的影响。
J Med Genet. 2019 Sep;56(9):581-589. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106072. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization, Education, and Resourcing: The Way Forward for Implementing Polygenic Risk Scores in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.标准化、教育与资源配置:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中实施多基因风险评分的未来之路
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70323. doi: 10.1111/cts.70323.
2
SNP's use as a potential chemotoxicity stratification tool in breast cancer: from bench to clinic.单核苷酸多态性作为乳腺癌潜在化学毒性分层工具的应用:从实验室到临床
Funct Integr Genomics. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01602-4.
3
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.与仅基于家族病史的咨询相比,基因检测报告能增强对风险信息的理解以及对预防建议的接受度。
J Behav Med. 2015 Oct;38(5):740-53. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9648-z. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
2
Prediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variants.基于常见基因变异谱预测乳腺癌风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 8;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv036. Print 2015 May.
3
Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer.
临床中的多基因风险评分:对利益相关者观点、态度和经历的系统评价
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(3):266-280. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01747-z. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
4
Using polygenic risk modification to improve breast cancer prevention: study protocol for the PRiMo multicentre randomised controlled trial.多基因风险修饰改善乳腺癌预防:PRiMo 多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):e087874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087874.
5
How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review.癌症分子检测中的价值如何定义?一项范围综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):409-424. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00901-4. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
The role of polygenic risk scores in breast cancer risk perception and decision-making.多基因风险评分在乳腺癌风险认知和决策中的作用。
J Community Genet. 2023 Oct;14(5):489-501. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00655-x. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
7
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes.基于多基因风险评分的风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国全科医生知识和态度的调查。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;14(3):732. doi: 10.3390/genes14030732.
8
Need for numbers: assessing cancer survivors' needs for personalized and generic statistical information.需要数字:评估癌症幸存者对个性化和通用统计信息的需求。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02005-2.
9
A qualitative study exploring the consumer experience of receiving self-initiated polygenic risk scores from a third-party website.一项探索消费者自身从第三方网站获取多基因风险评分的体验的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):424-429. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01203-w. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
10
Perceptions of causal attribution and attitudes to genetic testing among people with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives.精神分裂症患者及其一级亲属对因果归因的看法和对基因检测的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;30(10):1147-1154. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01116-8. Epub 2022 May 16.
对超过12万名个体进行的全基因组关联分析确定了15个新的乳腺癌易感基因座。
Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):373-80. doi: 10.1038/ng.3242. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.通过单核苷酸多态性检测评估乳腺癌风险实现个性化医疗:临床应用
J Genet Couns. 2015 Oct;24(5):744-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9803-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
5
Talking about familial breast cancer risk: topics and strategies to enhance mother-daughter interactions.谈家族性乳腺癌风险:增进母女互动的话题与策略
Qual Health Res. 2014 Apr;24(4):517-35. doi: 10.1177/1049732314524638. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.关于结直肠癌风险适度增加的基因检测的兴趣和信息偏好。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(1):48-60. doi: 10.1159/000356567. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
7
Implementing risk-stratified screening for common cancers: a review of potential ethical, legal and social issues.实施常见癌症的风险分层筛查:对潜在伦理、法律和社会问题的综述
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun;36(2):285-91. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt078. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
8
Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers.直接面向消费者的基因检测对健康行为和焦虑的影响:一项针对消费者和潜在消费者的调查。
J Genet Couns. 2013 Oct;22(5):565-75. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9582-6. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk.大规模基因分型鉴定出 41 个与乳腺癌风险相关的新位点。
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):353-61, 361e1-2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2563.
10
Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications.将基因组学纳入乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查:评估其影响。
Genet Med. 2013 Jun;15(6):423-32. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.167. Epub 2013 Feb 14.