SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Aug;37 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S27-S35. doi: 10.1111/dar.12638. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Taxation is increasingly being used as an effective means of influencing behaviour in relation to harmful products. In this paper we use data from six participating countries of the International Alcohol Control Study to examine and evaluate their comparative prices and tax regimes.
We calculate taxes and prices for three high-income and three middle-income countries. The data are drawn from the International Alcohol Control survey and from the Alcohol Environment Protocol. Tax systems are described and then the rates of tax on key products presented. Comparisons are made using the Purchasing Power Parity rates. The price and purchase data from each country's International Alcohol Control survey is then used to calculate the mean percentage of retail price paid in tax weighted by actual consumption.
Both ad valorem and specific per unit of alcohol taxation systems are represented among the six countries. The prices differ widely between countries even though presented in terms of Purchasing Power Parity. The percentage of tax in the final price also varies widely but is much lower than the 75% set by the World Health Organization as a goal for tobacco tax.
There is considerable variation in tax systems and prices across countries. There is scope to increase taxation and this analysis provides comparable data, including the percentage of tax in final price, from some middle and high-income countries for consideration in policy discussion.
税收正日益成为影响有害产品相关行为的有效手段。本文利用国际酒精控制研究的六个参与国的数据,对其相对价格和税收制度进行了考察和评估。
我们为三个高收入国家和三个中等收入国家计算了税收和价格。数据来自国际酒精控制调查和酒精环境议定书。我们对税收制度进行了描述,然后介绍了主要产品的税率。使用购买力平价进行了比较。然后,使用每个国家国际酒精控制调查的价格和购买数据,根据实际消费情况计算加权后的零售价格中税收所占的平均百分比。
六个国家都采用了从价和特定单位酒精两种征税制度。即使以购买力平价表示,各国的价格差异也很大。最后价格中的税收比例也差异很大,但远低于世界卫生组织设定的 75%作为烟草税目标。
各国的税收制度和价格存在很大差异。有增加税收的空间,本分析提供了从中等和高收入国家中获取的可比数据,包括最后价格中的税收比例,以供政策讨论考虑。