Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01177-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
Tax pass-through rates to prices measure how much prices increase when taxes are increased by one unit, which will in turn determine the effectiveness of taxation policies in reducing substance use. Using longitudinal data of alcohol prices and excise taxes from 27 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries from 2003 to 2016, we estimate the tax pass-through rates to prices for a variety of alcoholic beverages-beer (1.24; 95% CIs: [0.67, 1.81]), wine (2.4; 95% CIs: [1.7, 3.11]), Cognac (1.71; 95% CIs: [1.07, 2.35]), Gin (0.85; 95% CIs: [0.34, 1.35]), Scotch whisky (1.14; 95% CIs: [0.52, 1.75]), and Liqueur Cointreau (1.98; 95% CIs: [1.21, 2.76]). While excise taxes on wine, Cognac, and Liqueur Cointreau are over-shifted to prices, taxes on Gin are exact- or under-shifted. Excise taxes on beer and Scotch whisky are likely over-shifted to prices, but the tax pass-through rates for these beverages are not significantly different from 1 and we cannot completely rule out exact pass-through of taxes to prices. The tax pass-through to prices for most beverage types is also higher for higher-priced products. Dynamic model further shows a lagged impact of wine and beer taxes on prices, indicating pricing strategies that may target lower-priced beer and wine.
税收向价格的传递率衡量的是当税收增加一个单位时,价格会增加多少,这将反过来决定税收政策在减少物质使用方面的有效性。我们利用 2003 年至 2016 年来自 27 个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的酒类价格和消费税的纵向数据,对各种酒类的税收向价格的传递率进行了估计,包括啤酒(1.24;95%置信区间:[0.67,1.81])、葡萄酒(2.4;95%置信区间:[1.7,3.11])、干邑白兰地(1.71;95%置信区间:[1.07,2.35])、金酒(0.85;95%置信区间:[0.34,1.35])、苏格兰威士忌(1.14;95%置信区间:[0.52,1.75])和库勒白兰地(1.98;95%置信区间:[1.21,2.76])。尽管葡萄酒、干邑白兰地和库勒白兰地的消费税都过度转移到了价格上,但金酒的消费税则是准确或低估转移。啤酒和苏格兰威士忌的消费税很可能也过度转移到了价格上,但这些饮料的税收向价格的传递率与 1 没有显著差异,我们也不能完全排除税收对价格的完全传递。对于大多数饮料类型,价格较高的产品的税收向价格的传递率也更高。动态模型进一步显示了葡萄酒和啤酒税对价格的滞后影响,表明定价策略可能针对价格较低的啤酒和葡萄酒。