Suppr超能文献

经合组织国家酒类消费税向价格的传递。

The pass-through of alcohol excise taxes to prices in OECD countries.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01177-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Abstract

Tax pass-through rates to prices measure how much prices increase when taxes are increased by one unit, which will in turn determine the effectiveness of taxation policies in reducing substance use. Using longitudinal data of alcohol prices and excise taxes from 27 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries from 2003 to 2016, we estimate the tax pass-through rates to prices for a variety of alcoholic beverages-beer (1.24; 95% CIs: [0.67, 1.81]), wine (2.4; 95% CIs: [1.7, 3.11]), Cognac (1.71; 95% CIs: [1.07, 2.35]), Gin (0.85; 95% CIs: [0.34, 1.35]), Scotch whisky (1.14; 95% CIs: [0.52, 1.75]), and Liqueur Cointreau (1.98; 95% CIs: [1.21, 2.76]). While excise taxes on wine, Cognac, and Liqueur Cointreau are over-shifted to prices, taxes on Gin are exact- or under-shifted. Excise taxes on beer and Scotch whisky are likely over-shifted to prices, but the tax pass-through rates for these beverages are not significantly different from 1 and we cannot completely rule out exact pass-through of taxes to prices. The tax pass-through to prices for most beverage types is also higher for higher-priced products. Dynamic model further shows a lagged impact of wine and beer taxes on prices, indicating pricing strategies that may target lower-priced beer and wine.

摘要

税收向价格的传递率衡量的是当税收增加一个单位时,价格会增加多少,这将反过来决定税收政策在减少物质使用方面的有效性。我们利用 2003 年至 2016 年来自 27 个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的酒类价格和消费税的纵向数据,对各种酒类的税收向价格的传递率进行了估计,包括啤酒(1.24;95%置信区间:[0.67,1.81])、葡萄酒(2.4;95%置信区间:[1.7,3.11])、干邑白兰地(1.71;95%置信区间:[1.07,2.35])、金酒(0.85;95%置信区间:[0.34,1.35])、苏格兰威士忌(1.14;95%置信区间:[0.52,1.75])和库勒白兰地(1.98;95%置信区间:[1.21,2.76])。尽管葡萄酒、干邑白兰地和库勒白兰地的消费税都过度转移到了价格上,但金酒的消费税则是准确或低估转移。啤酒和苏格兰威士忌的消费税很可能也过度转移到了价格上,但这些饮料的税收向价格的传递率与 1 没有显著差异,我们也不能完全排除税收对价格的完全传递。对于大多数饮料类型,价格较高的产品的税收向价格的传递率也更高。动态模型进一步显示了葡萄酒和啤酒税对价格的滞后影响,表明定价策略可能针对价格较低的啤酒和葡萄酒。

相似文献

1
The pass-through of alcohol excise taxes to prices in OECD countries.经合组织国家酒类消费税向价格的传递。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01177-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Erosion of State Alcohol Excise Taxes in the United States.美国国家酒类消费税的侵蚀。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jan;79(1):43-48. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.43.
8
Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2010 Apr 19;192(8):439-43. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03581.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Tax Incidence and Tax Pass-Through of Smokeless Tobacco in the US.美国无烟气烟草的税负归宿和税负转嫁。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 2;21(11):1465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111465.
8
Tax incidence of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in the USA.美国电子烟的税收归宿。
Tob Control. 2023 Aug;32(e2):e160-e165. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056774. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2018.美国各州 1999-2018 年的酒精政策。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jan;81(1):58-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.58.
3
An international analysis of the price and affordability of beer.国际啤酒价格与可负担性分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 17;13(12):e0208831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208831. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验