Shang Ce, Chaloupka Frank J, Zahra Nahleen, Fong Geoffrey T
Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, , Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i23-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050966. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
The distribution of cigarette prices has rarely been studied and compared under different tax structures. Descriptive evidence on price distributions by countries can shed light on opportunities for tax avoidance and brand switching under different tobacco tax structures, which could impact the effectiveness of increased taxation in reducing smoking.
This paper aims to describe the distribution of cigarette prices by countries and to compare these distributions based on the tobacco tax structure in these countries.
We employed data for 16 countries taken from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project to construct survey-derived cigarette prices for each country. Self-reported prices were weighted by cigarette consumption and described using a comprehensive set of statistics. We then compared these statistics for cigarette prices under different tax structures. In particular, countries of similar income levels and countries that impose similar total excise taxes using different tax structures were paired and compared in mean and variance using a two-sample comparison test.
Our investigation illustrates that, compared with specific uniform taxation, other tax structures, such as ad valorem uniform taxation, mixed (a tax system using ad valorem and specific taxes) uniform taxation, and tiered tax structures of specific, ad valorem and mixed taxation tend to have price distributions with greater variability. Countries that rely heavily on ad valorem and tiered taxes also tend to have greater price variability around the median. Among mixed taxation systems, countries that rely more heavily on the ad valorem component tend to have greater price variability than countries that rely more heavily on the specific component. In countries with tiered tax systems, cigarette prices are skewed more towards lower prices than are prices under uniform tax systems. The analyses presented here demonstrate that more opportunities exist for tax avoidance and brand switching when the tax structure departs from a uniform specific tax.
在不同税收结构下,香烟价格分布的研究和比较很少。各国香烟价格分布的描述性证据可以揭示不同烟草税收结构下的避税和品牌转换机会,这可能会影响提高税收在减少吸烟方面的有效性。
本文旨在描述各国香烟价格分布,并根据这些国家的烟草税收结构对这些分布进行比较。
我们使用了来自国际烟草控制政策评估项目的16个国家的数据,为每个国家构建了基于调查得出的香烟价格。自我报告的价格按香烟消费量加权,并使用一套全面的统计数据进行描述。然后,我们比较了不同税收结构下香烟价格的这些统计数据。特别是,将收入水平相似的国家以及使用不同税收结构征收相似消费税总额的国家配对,并使用双样本比较检验对均值和方差进行比较。
我们的调查表明,与从量统一征税相比,其他税收结构,如从价统一征税、混合(使用从价税和从量税的税收制度)统一征税以及从量、从价和混合征税的分级税收结构,往往具有更大的价格分布变异性。严重依赖从价税和分级税的国家在中位数附近的价格变异性也往往更大。在混合税收制度中,更依赖从价税成分的国家往往比更依赖从量税成分的国家具有更大的价格变异性。在实行分级税收制度的国家,香烟价格比统一税收制度下的价格更倾向于低价。此处的分析表明,当税收结构偏离统一从量税时,存在更多的避税和品牌转换机会。