Nickerson Brett S, Esco Michael R, Bishop Phillip A, Kliszczewicz Brian M, Williford Henry N, Park Kyung-Shin, Welborn Bailey A, Snarr Ronald L, Tolusso Danilo V
Department of Professional Prograams, Texas A&M International University, Laredo TX, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Nov 1;10(7):1085-1093. doi: 10.70252/EWET6590. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of this study was to determine if heat exposure alters the measures of total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), and intracellular water (ICW) in both single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Additionally, we sought to determine if any differences exist between the BIA and BIS techniques before and after brief exposure to heat. Body water was evaluated for twenty men (age=24±4 years) in a thermoneutral environment (22°C) before (PRE) and immediately after (POST) 15 min of passive heating (35°C) in an environmental chamber. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement at PRE demonstrated that BIS yielded significantly higher body water values than BIA (all p<0.05; TBW=1.8kg; ECW=0.6±1.3kg; ICW=1.2±3.7kg). However, the effect size (ES) of the mean differences at PRE were small and the r-values were high (r≥0.97). TBW and ICW remained significantly higher at POST for BIS (both p<0.05; 1.4±3.2kg and 1.1±3.7kg, respectively) whereas ECW was not different (p>0.05; 0.2±1.5kg). Additionally, the ES of the mean differences at POST were trivial to small and the r-values were high (r≥0.96). When analyzing the changes in body water before and after heat exposure, POST values for BIS were significantly higher than PRE (all p<0.001; TBW=0.6±0.8kg; ECW=0.4±0.3kg; ICW=0.3±0.6kg). Similarly, POST values for BIA were significantly higher than PRE (all p<0.001; TBW=1.0±0.6kg; ECW=0.7±0.4kg; ICW=0.4±0.4kg). BIA and BIS provide similar body water estimates. However, the increase in POST body water values indicate more research is needed before either method can be used for estimating body water after heat exposure.
本研究的目的是确定热暴露是否会改变单频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)中全身水(TBW)、细胞外水(ECW)和细胞内水(ICW)的测量值。此外,我们试图确定在短暂暴露于热之前和之后,BIA和BIS技术之间是否存在差异。在环境舱中,对20名男性(年龄=24±4岁)在热中性环境(22°C)下进行被动加热(35°C)15分钟之前(PRE)和之后立即(POST)的身体水分进行评估。PRE时的平均差异和95%一致性界限表明,BIS得出的身体水分值显著高于BIA(所有p<0.05;TBW=1.8kg;ECW=0.6±1.3kg;ICW=1.2±3.7kg)。然而,PRE时平均差异的效应大小(ES)较小,r值较高(r≥0.97)。BIS在POST时TBW和ICW仍显著更高(均p<0.05;分别为1.4±3.2kg和1.1±3.7kg),而ECW无差异(p>0.05;0.2±1.5kg)。此外,POST时平均差异的ES微不足道至较小,r值较高(r≥0.96)。在分析热暴露前后身体水分的变化时,BIS的POST值显著高于PRE(所有p<0.001;TBW=0.6±0.8kg;ECW=0.4±0.3kg;ICW=0.3±0.6kg)。同样,BIA的POST值显著高于PRE(所有p<0.001;TBW=1.0±0.6kg;ECW=0.7±0.4kg;ICW=0.4±0.4kg)。BIA和BIS提供相似的身体水分估计值。然而,POST时身体水分值的增加表明,在任何一种方法可用于估计热暴露后的身体水分之前,还需要更多的研究。