Wang Tony J C, Fontenla Sandra, McCann Patrick, Young Robert J, McNamara Stephen, Rao Shyam, Mechalakos James G, Lee Nancy Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
J Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;2(4):407-412. doi: 10.1007/s13566-013-0094-7. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
To correlate the planned dose to the nausea center (NC) - area postrema (AP) and dorsal vagal complex (DVC) - with nausea and vomiting symptoms in OPC patients treated with IMRT without chemotherapy. We also investigated whether it was possible to reduce doses to the NC without significant degradation of the clinically accepted treatment plan.
From 11/04 to 4/09, 37 OPC patients were treated with definitive or adjuvant IMRT without chemotherapy. Of these, only 23 patients had restorable plans and were included in this analysis. We contoured the NC with the assistance of an expert board-certified neuroradiologist. We searched for correlation between the delivered dose to the NC and patient-reported nausea and vomiting during IMRT. We used one-paired t-test: two-sample assuming equal variances to compare differences in dose to NC between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. We then replanned each case to determine if reduced dose to the NC could be achieved without compromising coverage to target volumes, increasing unwarranted hotspots or increasing dose to surrounding critical normal tissues.
Acute symptoms of nausea were as follows: Grade 0 (n=6), Grade 1 (n=13), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 3 (n=1). Patients with no complaints of nausea had a median dose to the DVC of 34.2 Gy (range 4.6-46.6 Gy) and AP of 32.6 Gy (range 7.0-41.4Gy); whereas those with any complaints of nausea had a median DVC dose of 40.4 Gy (range 19.3-49.4 Gy) and AP dose of 38.7 Gy (range 16.7-46.8 Gy) (p=0.04). Acute vomiting was as follows: Grade 0 (n=17), Grade 1 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=1), and Grade 3 (n=1). There was no significant difference in DVC or AP dose among those with and without vomiting symptoms (p=0.28).Upon replanning of each case to minimize dose to the NC, we were, on average, able to reduce the radiation dose to AP by 18% and DVC by 17%; while the average dose variations to the PTV coverage, brainstem, cord, temporal lobes, and cochlea were never greater than 3%. Hotspots increased by 2% for 3 patients while hotspots for remaining patients were less than 2% variation.
For OPC cancer patients treated with IMRT without chemotherapy, dose to AP and DVC may be associated with development of nausea. We were able to show that reducing doses substantially to the NC is achievable without significant alteration of the clinically accepted plan and may reduce the incidence and grade of nausea. As symptoms of nausea can be devastating to patients, one can consider routine contouring and constraining of the NC to minimize chances of having this complication.
将计划给予恶心中枢(NC)——最后区(AP)和迷走背侧复合体(DVC)的剂量与接受调强放射治疗(IMRT)且未进行化疗的口咽癌(OPC)患者的恶心和呕吐症状相关联。我们还研究了在不显著降低临床可接受治疗计划质量的情况下,是否有可能降低给予NC的剂量。
从2004年11月至2009年4月,37例OPC患者接受了确定性或辅助性IMRT且未进行化疗。其中,只有23例患者有可恢复的计划并纳入本分析。我们在一位获得专家委员会认证的神经放射科医生的协助下勾勒出NC。我们寻找给予NC的剂量与患者报告的IMRT期间恶心和呕吐之间的相关性。我们使用单样本t检验:假设方差相等的两样本检验来比较有症状和无症状患者之间给予NC的剂量差异。然后我们对每个病例重新规划,以确定在不影响靶区覆盖、不增加不必要的热点或不增加周围关键正常组织剂量的情况下,是否可以实现降低给予NC的剂量。
恶心的急性症状如下:0级(n = 6)、1级(n = 13)、2级(n = 3)和3级(n = 1)。无恶心主诉的患者,DVC的中位剂量为34.2 Gy(范围4.6 - 46.6 Gy),AP的中位剂量为32.6 Gy(范围7.0 - 41.4 Gy);而有任何恶心主诉的患者,DVC的中位剂量为40.4 Gy(范围19.3 - 49.4 Gy),AP的中位剂量为38.7 Gy(范围16.7 - 46.8 Gy)(p = 0.04)。急性呕吐情况如下:0级(n = 17)、1级(n = 4)、2级(n = 1)和3级(n = 1)。有呕吐症状和无呕吐症状的患者之间,DVC或AP剂量无显著差异(p = (此处原文有误,应为0.28))。在对每个病例重新规划以尽量减少给予NC的剂量后,我们平均能够将给予AP的辐射剂量降低18%,将给予DVC的剂量降低17%;而对计划靶体积(PTV)覆盖、脑干、脊髓、颞叶和耳蜗的平均剂量变化从未超过3%。3例患者的热点增加了2%,而其余患者的热点变化小于2%。
对于接受IMRT且未进行化疗的OPC癌症患者,给予AP和DVC的剂量可能与恶心的发生有关。我们能够证明,在不显著改变临床可接受计划的情况下,大幅降低给予NC的剂量是可行的,并且可能降低恶心的发生率和严重程度。由于恶心症状可能对患者造成严重影响,可考虑常规勾勒和限制NC来尽量减少出现这种并发症的几率。