Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Molecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 200892-0810, USA.
Purinergic Signal. 2018 Mar;14(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/s11302-017-9592-1. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
Activity of the A adenosine receptor (AR) allosteric modulators LUF6000 (2-cyclohexyl-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine) and LUF6096 (N-{2-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]quinolin-4-yl}cyclohexanecarbox-amide) was compared at four AAR species homologs used in preclinical drug development. In guanosine 5'-[γ-[S]thio]triphosphate ([S]GTPγS) binding assays with cell membranes isolated from human embryonic kidney cells stably expressing recombinant AARs, both modulators substantially enhanced agonist efficacy at human, dog, and rabbit AARs but provided only weak activity at mouse AARs. For human, dog, and rabbit, both modulators increased the maximal efficacy of the AAR agonist 2-chloro-N -(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide as well as adenosine > 2-fold, while slightly reducing potency in human and dog. Based on results from N -(4-amino-3-[I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide ([I]I-AB-MECA) binding assays, we hypothesize that potency reduction is explained by an allosterically induced slowing in orthosteric ligand binding kinetics that reduces the rate of formation of ligand-receptor complexes. Mutation of four amino acid residues of the human AAR to the murine sequence identified the extracellular loop 1 (EL1) region as being important in selectively controlling the allosteric actions of LUF6096 on [I]I-AB-MECA binding kinetics. Homology modeling suggested interaction between species-variable EL1 and agonist-contacting EL2. These results indicate that AAR allostery is species-dependent and provide mechanistic insights into this therapeutically promising class of agents.
A 腺苷受体 (AR) 变构调节剂 LUF6000(2-环己基-N-(3,4-二氯苯基)-1H-咪唑[4,5-c]喹啉-4-胺)和 LUF6096(N-{2-[(3,4-二氯苯基)氨基]喹啉-4-基}环己烷甲酰胺)在用于临床前药物开发的四个 AAR 同种型中的活性进行了比较。在与人肾细胞稳定表达重组 AAR 的细胞膜进行的鸟苷 5'-[γ-[S]硫代]三磷酸 ([S]GTPγS) 结合测定中,两种调节剂均显著增强了激动剂在人、犬和兔 AAR 中的效力,但在鼠 AAR 中仅表现出微弱的活性。对于人、犬和兔,两种调节剂均增加了 AAR 激动剂 2-氯-N-(3-碘苄基)腺苷-5'-N-甲基羧酰胺以及腺苷的最大效力>2 倍,同时略微降低了人源和犬源的效力。基于 N-(4-氨基-3-[I]碘苄基)腺苷-5'-N-甲基羧酰胺 ([I]I-AB-MECA) 结合测定的结果,我们假设效力降低是由变构诱导的变构配体结合动力学减慢引起的,从而降低了配体-受体复合物的形成速率。人 AAR 的四个氨基酸残基突变为鼠序列,确定细胞外环 1(EL1)区域在选择性控制 LUF6096 对 [I]I-AB-MECA 结合动力学的变构作用方面很重要。同源建模表明物种可变 EL1 与激动剂接触的 EL2 之间存在相互作用。这些结果表明 AAR 变构是物种依赖性的,并为这一具有治疗潜力的药物类别提供了机制上的见解。