Department of Clinical Sciences/CRC, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Health Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 May;19(3):410-419. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12611. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
Treatments have failed to delay or stop the autoimmune process, preceding onset of type 1 diabetes. We investigated if autoantigen-specific treatment with alum-formulated glutamate decarboxylase (GAD-Alum) was safe and affected progression to type 1 diabetes in children with islet autoimmunity.
In an investigator-initiated, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, non-diabetic children aged 4 to 17.9 years with autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) and at least one of insulinoma-associated protein 2, insulin or zinc-transporter 8, were randomized, stratified by 2 or ≥3 islet autoantibodies, to 2 injections of 20 μg GAD-Alum or placebo, 30 days apart. Main outcome was safety, investigated by adverse events, hematology, chemistry, thyroid and celiac autoimmunity and titers of islet autoantibodies, and efficacy, investigated by cumulative incidence of diabetes onset over 5-year follow-up. Secondary variables: change in first-phase insulin release (FPIR) after intravenous glucose tolerance tests, fasting, 120 minutes and Area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide and p-glucose after oral glucose tolerance tests and HbA1c.
Fifty children (median age: 5.2) were assigned 1:1 to GAD-Alum or placebo, all receiving full treatment and included in the analyses. GAD-Alum did not affect any safety parameter, while GADA titers increased (P = .001). Time to clinical diagnosis was not affected by treatment (hazard ratio, HR = 0.77, P = .574) in the full population or in the separate stratum groups. Treatment did not affect any of the secondary variables.
GAD-Alum as a subcutaneous prime and boost injection was safe in prediabetic young children but did not affect progression to type 1 diabetes. The safety of GAD-Alum should prove useful in future prevention studies.
针对 1 型糖尿病发病前的自身免疫过程,目前的治疗方法均未能取得延缓或阻止效果。我们研究了谷氨酸脱羧酶(GAD)-明矾制剂(GAD-Alum)的抗原特异性治疗是否安全,并观察其是否会影响胰岛自身免疫的儿童发展为 1 型糖尿病。
在一项由研究者发起的、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,招募了年龄在 4 至 17.9 岁之间、存在谷氨酸脱羧酶自身抗体(GADA)且至少有一种胰岛相关蛋白 2、胰岛素或锌转运蛋白 8 自身抗体的非糖尿病儿童。根据是否存在 2 种或≥3 种胰岛自身抗体,将其随机分为 2 组,分别接受 20μg GAD-Alum 或安慰剂,每 30 天注射 1 次,共 2 次。主要观察终点为安全性,通过不良事件、血液学、化学、甲状腺和乳糜泻自身免疫以及胰岛自身抗体滴度进行评估。次要观察终点为 5 年随访期间糖尿病发病的累积发生率,以及静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)后的第 1 时相胰岛素分泌(FPIR)、空腹、120 分钟和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)后的曲线下面积(AUC)C 肽和 p-葡萄糖以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。
共有 50 名儿童(中位年龄:5.2 岁)按 1:1 随机分为 GAD-Alum 或安慰剂组,所有儿童均接受了完整的治疗并纳入分析。GAD-Alum 治疗未影响任何安全性参数,但 GADA 滴度升高(P = .001)。在整个研究人群和单独的分层组中,治疗均未影响临床诊断时间(危险比,HR = 0.77,P = .574)。治疗也未影响任何次要观察终点。
GAD-Alum 作为皮内疫苗接种的加强针,在患有糖尿病前期的幼儿中是安全的,但未能阻止 1 型糖尿病的进展。GAD-Alum 的安全性将有助于未来的预防研究。