Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds.
Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London.
Health Psychol. 2018 Feb;37(2):160-169. doi: 10.1037/hea0000541. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
To investigate the relationships between social isolation, health literacy, and all-cause mortality, and the modifying effect of social isolation on the latter relationship.
Data were from 7731 adults aged ≥50 years participating in Wave 2 (2004/2005) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Social isolation was defined according to marital/cohabiting status and contact with children, relatives, and friends, and participation in social organizations. Scores were split at the median to indicate social isolation (yes vs. no). Health literacy was assessed as comprehension of a medicine label and classified as "high" (≥75% correct) or "low" (<75% correct). The outcome was all-cause mortality up to February 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, health status, health behaviors, and cognitive function.
Mortality rates were 30.3% versus 14.3% in the low versus high health literacy groups, and 23.5% versus 13.7% in the socially isolated versus nonisolated groups. Low health literacy (adj. HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.45 vs. high) and social isolation (adj. HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.50) were independently associated with increased mortality risk. The multiplicative interaction term for health literacy and social isolation was not statistically significant (p = .81).
Low health literacy and high social isolation are risk factors for mortality. Social isolation does not modify the relationship between health literacy and mortality. Clinicians should be aware of the health risks faced by socially isolated adults and those with low health literacy. (PsycINFO Database Record
探讨社会隔离、健康素养与全因死亡率之间的关系,以及社会隔离对后者关系的调节作用。
数据来自于 7731 名年龄≥50 岁的成年人,他们参加了英国老龄化纵向研究的第 2 波(2004/2005 年)。社会隔离根据婚姻/同居状况以及与子女、亲属和朋友的接触情况和参加社会组织的情况来定义。得分以中位数进行划分,以表示社会隔离(是/否)。健康素养评估为对药品标签的理解,并分为“高”(≥75%正确)或“低”(<75%正确)。结局为截至 2013 年 2 月的全因死亡率。Cox 比例风险模型调整了社会人口统计学因素、健康状况、健康行为和认知功能。
低健康素养组的死亡率为 30.3%,高健康素养组为 14.3%;社会隔离组的死亡率为 23.5%,非社会隔离组为 13.7%。低健康素养(调整 HR = 1.22,95%CI 1.02-1.45 比高)和社会隔离(调整 HR = 1.28,95%CI 1.10-1.50)与死亡率风险增加独立相关。健康素养和社会隔离之间的乘法交互项无统计学意义(p =.81)。
低健康素养和高度社会隔离是死亡的危险因素。社会隔离不会改变健康素养与死亡率之间的关系。临床医生应该意识到社会隔离的成年人和健康素养较低的成年人所面临的健康风险。