Department of Psychiatry.
Emotion. 2018 Aug;18(5):670-692. doi: 10.1037/emo0000376. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Emotional experience (EE) and trait emotional awareness (tEA) have recently become topics of considerable experimental/theoretical interest within the cognitive and neural sciences. However, to date there has been limited empirical focus on how individual differences in the factors contributing to EE (a state-based construct) might account for differences in tEA. To promote clear, well-guided empirical research in this area, in this article we first offer a concise review of the primary factors contributing to EE. We then provide a theoretical investigation into how individual differences in these factors (i.e., differences in affective response generation, affective response representation, and conscious access) could mechanistically account for differences in tEA; we also discuss plausible origins of these individual differences in light of current empirical findings. Finally, we outline possible experiments that would support (or fail to support) the role of each factor in explaining differences in tEA-and how this added knowledge could shed light on the known link between low tEA and multiple emotion-related mental and systemic medical disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record
情绪体验(EE)和特质情绪意识(tEA)最近成为认知和神经科学领域内相当具有实验/理论意义的主题。然而,迄今为止,对于构成 EE 的因素(一种基于状态的建构)的个体差异如何解释 tEA 的差异,实证研究关注有限。为了在这一领域促进明确、有良好指导的实证研究,本文首先对促成 EE 的主要因素进行了简洁的回顾。然后,我们对这些因素中的个体差异(即情感反应生成、情感反应表现和意识获取方面的差异)如何能够从机制上解释 tEA 的差异进行了理论探讨;我们还根据当前的实证发现讨论了这些个体差异的可能起源。最后,我们概述了可能的实验,这些实验将支持(或不支持)每个因素在解释 tEA 差异中的作用——以及这种附加知识如何阐明低 tEA 与多种与情绪相关的精神和系统性医学疾病之间的已知联系。