Suppr超能文献

两种方法的比较:腰麻与坐骨直肠阻滞对痔切除术后疼痛及住院时间的影响:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of Two Methods: Spinal Anesthesia and Ischiorectal Block on Post Hemorrhoidectomy Pain and Hospital Stay: A Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Nadri Sedigheh, Mahmoudvand Hormoz, Rokrok Shirin, Tarrahi Mohammad Javad

机构信息

a Department of Anesthesiology , Lorestan University of Medical Sciences , Khorramabad , Iran.

b Department of Surgery , Lorestan University of Medical Sciences , Khorramabad , Iran.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2018 Oct;31(5):420-424. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1349221. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hemorrhoidectomy is one of the most common hemorrhoid surgery. Many areas are innervated by nerves, and this makes the surgery to be very painful. Various anesthetic methods have been proposed, and the number of investigations and procedures demonstrated the absence of a reliable method for reducing pain. This study compares the cavity ischiorectal block with spinal anesthesia in reducing postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and hospital stay.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study is a randomized control trial carried out on seventy patients sampled. Thirty-five (35) among them were placed in spinal anesthesia group, and the other 35 were placed in the ischiorectal block group. According to the study, questionnaire was designed in such a way that postoperative variables such as postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, changes in blood pressure, heart rate and hospital stay in both groups were evaluated and compared.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT2015111616516N3 ( http://en.search.irct.ir/search?query=IRCT2015111616516N3 ) Results: In this study, the pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hr for spinal anesthesia group after surgery were 0, 3.08 ± 0.78, 2.05 ± 1.02, 1.11 ± 0.83, respectively (p < 0.05). That of ischiorectal blocks were 0.98 ± 0.25, 1.57 ± 0.81, 0.91 ± 0.91, and 0.63 ± 0.31 respectively, which indicated lesser pain after surgery in the ischiorectal block at 6, 12, and 24 hr. In this study, out of the 35 patients that underwent spinal anesthesia, 28 patients (80%) were hospitalized in the first 6 hr, 13 patients (37.1%) in the second 6 hr, 3 patients (8.6%) in the second 12 hr after surgery. For patients under the ischiorectal block, the number of patients hospitalized were 13 patients (37.1%), in the first 6 hr, 4 patients (11.4%) in the second 6 hr, and 1 (2.9%) were hospitalized in the second 12 hr after surgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ischiorectal blocks causes less pain, require fewer painkillers, and reduces the hospital stay after surgery than spinal anesthesia.

摘要

目的

痔切除术是最常见的痔疮手术之一。许多区域由神经支配,这使得该手术非常疼痛。已经提出了各种麻醉方法,并且大量的研究和手术表明缺乏一种可靠的减轻疼痛的方法。本研究比较了坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞与脊髓麻醉在减轻术后疼痛、镇痛药用量和住院时间方面的效果。

研究设计

本研究是一项对70例患者进行的随机对照试验。其中35例被纳入脊髓麻醉组,另外35例被纳入坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞组。根据研究,设计了调查问卷,以评估和比较两组术后的变量,如术后疼痛、镇痛药用量、血压变化、心率和住院时间。

临床试验注册

IRCT2015111616516N3(http://en.search.irct.ir/search?query=IRCT2015111616516N3)结果:在本研究中,脊髓麻醉组术后0、6、12和24小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分分别为0、3.08±0.78、2.05±1.02、1.11±0.83(p<0.05)。坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞组的评分分别为0.98±0.25、1.57±0.81、0.91±0.91和0.63±0.31,这表明坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞组在术后6、12和24小时疼痛较轻。在本研究中,35例接受脊髓麻醉的患者中,28例(80%)在术后前6小时住院,13例(37.1%)在接下来的6小时住院,3例(8.6%)在术后第二个12小时住院。对于接受坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞的患者,住院人数分别为13例(37.1%)在术后前6小时,4例(11.4%)在接下来的6小时,1例(2.9%)在术后第二个12小时住院(p<0.05)。

结论

与脊髓麻醉相比,坐骨直肠窝间隙阻滞引起的疼痛更少,所需镇痛药更少,术后住院时间更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验