Department of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, ZhongShan 2nd road, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02420-0.
Although previous studies have showed that epidural morphine can be used as a complement to local anesthetics for analgesia after postcesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, there is little known about the analgesic dosage of epidural morphine and hydromorphone for hemorrhoidectomy. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the potency ratio of hydromorphone to epidural morphine as well as effective analgesic dose for 50% patients (ED50) undergoing elective hemorrhoidectomy.
80 patients under elective hemorrhoidectomy with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in department of anesthesia, Dongguan Tungwah hospital. To assess the ED50, patients were treated with epidural morphine or epidural hydromorphone randomly using a biased coin method-determined dose with a sequential allocation procedure. Following surgery, standardized multimodal analgesia was administered to all patients. A pain response score of ≤ 3 (on a scale of 0-10) was determined to be the effective dose after 24 h following CSEA. The ED50 in both groups were determined using the probit regression and isotonic regression method. We also measured pain intensity by patient interview using a 10 point verbal numeric rating scale prospectively at 6, 12 and 24 h after CSEA, and adverse effects were also noted.
The ED50 was 0.350 mg (95% CI, 0.259-0.376 mg) in hydromorphone group and 1.129 mg (95% CI, 0.903-1.187 mg) in morphine group, respectively, estimated by isotonic regression method. Regression analysis with the probit, the ED50 of epidural hydromorphone was 0.366 mg (95% CI, 0.276-0.388 mg) and epidural morphine was 1.138 mg (95% CI, 0.910-1.201 mg). Exploratory findings showed that there was no difference between the most frequent dosages of epidural hydromorphone or epidural morphine in the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. When administered with epidural opioids at ED50 doses or higher, 97.5% (39/40) of epidural morphine patients and 97.5% (39/40) epidural hydromorphone of patients were satisfied with their analgesia.
Effective hemorrhoidectomy analgesia requires a 3:1 ratio of epidural morphine to epidural hydromorphone. Both drugs provide excellent patient satisfaction.
尽管先前的研究表明硬膜外吗啡可作为蛛网膜下腔麻醉后剖宫产术后局部麻醉的补充,用于镇痛,但对于肛肠痔切除术硬膜外吗啡和氢吗啡酮的镇痛剂量知之甚少。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以检查氢吗啡酮与硬膜外吗啡的效价比以及接受择期肛肠痔切除术患者的有效镇痛剂量 50%(ED50)。
80 例在麻醉科行椎管内麻醉下择期肛肠痔切除术的患者(CSEA)。为评估 ED50,采用偏倚硬币法确定剂量的序贯分配程序,随机给予硬膜外吗啡或硬膜外氢吗啡酮治疗。手术后,所有患者均接受标准化多模式镇痛。术后 24 小时,采用疼痛反应评分≤3(0-10 分)确定有效剂量。采用概率回归和等渗回归法确定两组的 ED50。我们还前瞻性地在 CSEA 后 6、12 和 24 小时通过患者访谈使用 10 分数字评分量表测量疼痛强度,并记录不良反应。
根据等渗回归法估计,氢吗啡酮组的 ED50 为 0.350mg(95%CI,0.259-0.376mg),吗啡组的 ED50 为 1.129mg(95%CI,0.903-1.187mg)。概率回归分析显示,硬膜外氢吗啡酮的 ED50 为 0.366mg(95%CI,0.276-0.388mg),硬膜外吗啡的 ED50 为 1.138mg(95%CI,0.910-1.201mg)。探索性发现表明,硬膜外氢吗啡酮或吗啡最常见剂量的恶心、呕吐和瘙痒发生率无差异。当给予 ED50 剂量或更高剂量的硬膜外阿片类药物时,97.5%(39/40)的硬膜外吗啡患者和 97.5%(39/40)的硬膜外氢吗啡酮患者对其镇痛效果满意。
有效的肛肠痔切除术镇痛需要硬膜外吗啡与硬膜外氢吗啡酮的 3:1 比值。两种药物均能提供良好的患者满意度。