Santos Guilherme de Castro, Braga Gisela Magalhães, Queiroz Fábio Lopes, Navarro Túlio Pinho, Gomez Renato Santiago
Curso de Pós-graduação em Ciências Aplicadas a Cirurgia e Oftalmologia, Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Sep-Oct;57(5):545-9. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302011000500013.
This study was designed to evaluate analgesia (pain intensity and analgesic consumption) and the time of discharge of patients who underwent ilioinguinal (II) and iliohypogastric (IH) nerve block associated with wound infiltration with 0.75% ropivacaine, or not, after inguinal hernia repair surgery under spinal anesthesia.
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with 34 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Patients were divided into two groups: control (C) and II and IH nerve block (B). Group C (n = 17) received spinal anesthesia with 15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine and Group B (n = 17) received spinal anesthesia with 15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine associated with II and IH nerve block (10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine) and surgical wound infiltration (10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine). The following data were analyzed: demographic data, pain intensity according to the visual analog scale (VAS), and number of doses of analgesics (dipyrone, ketorolac and nalbuphine) in the immediate postoperative period, as well as at the time of hospital discharge.
The VAS at rest was significantly lower in Group B compared with Group C (p < 0.05), three hours after the procedure, with no differences on VAS during movement in all postoperative periods. The number of doses of analgesics during the postoperative period was similar in both groups, but patients in Group B were discharged earlier than in Group C.
II and IH nerve block associated with surgical wound infiltration with 0.75% ropivacaine provides better postoperative analgesia and early hospital discharge in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia.
本研究旨在评估在脊髓麻醉下进行腹股沟疝修补手术后,接受0.75%罗哌卡因髂腹股沟(II)和髂腹下(IH)神经阻滞联合或不联合伤口浸润的患者的镇痛效果(疼痛强度和镇痛药消耗量)及出院时间。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,纳入34例行腹股沟疝修补术的患者。患者分为两组:对照组(C)和II及IH神经阻滞组(B)。C组(n = 17)接受15 mg高压0.5%布比卡因脊髓麻醉,B组(n = 17)接受15 mg高压0.5%布比卡因脊髓麻醉联合II及IH神经阻滞(10 mL 0.75%罗哌卡因)和手术伤口浸润(10 mL 0.75%罗哌卡因)。分析以下数据:人口统计学数据、根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛强度、术后即刻及出院时镇痛药(安乃近、酮咯酸和纳布啡)的使用剂量。
术后3小时,B组静息时的VAS显著低于C组(p < 0.05),所有术后时期运动时的VAS无差异。两组术后镇痛药使用剂量相似,但B组患者出院时间早于C组。
0.75%罗哌卡因联合手术伤口浸润的II及IH神经阻滞可为脊髓麻醉下进行腹股沟疝修补术的患者提供更好的术后镇痛效果,并使患者更早出院。