Suppr超能文献

测试认知干预在缓解加速长期遗忘(ALF)方面的有效性。

Testing the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in alleviating accelerated long term forgetting (ALF).

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence for Cognition and Its Disorders, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Central Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Cortex. 2019 Jan;110:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Abstract

It is well established that when retrieval or other forms of testing follow shortly after the acquisition of new information, long-term memory is improved in healthy subjects (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006). It is not known whether such early interventions would alleviate ALF, a condition in which early retention is normal, but there is a steep decline over longer intervals. A different behavioral intervention (i.e., an interposed recall of a story after a longer delay) was found to prevent subsequent memory loss in a single case with ALF (Jansari, Davis, McGibbon, Firminger, & Kapur, 2010; McGibbon & Jansari, 2013), but this has yet to be replicated. In the present study, we sought to test the effectiveness of early rehearsal as well as a later interposed recall on long term memory. Three men with ALF and 10 matched, healthy males (mean age = 67 yr; mean education = 15 yr) were compared for story recall following 3 early intervention conditions. There were two early rehearsal conditions: Repeated-Recall (2 additional recalls were requested in the initial 30 min interval) and Repeated Recall With Discussion (2 additional recalls plus discussion occurred in the initial 30 min interval) as well as a Control condition, in which there was no additional rehearsal in the first 30 min. Memory for 6 stories (2 in each condition) was tested at 0 min, 30 min, 1 day, 1 week and 4 weeks. In addition, to evaluate the possible sustaining effect of an additional retrieval ("booster recall") between 1 wk and 4 wk delays, 1 story from each of the early intervention conditions was recalled at 2 weeks' delay. Consistent with the profile characteristic of ALF, nonparametric statistics revealed no group differences at 0 or 30 min recalls. For Control stories, the ALF group's recall was impaired by 24 h delay. For stories in either of the early rehearsal conditions, the patients showed better retention, performing within normal limits until the 4 week recall. The "booster recall" session at 2 weeks benefitted the patients' retention at 4 weeks, with patients' mean recall remaining within normal limits only for those stories recalled at 2 weeks. These results indicate that behavioral interventions including early rehearsal in the first several min and a booster recall at a much later time point help to prevent ALF. Confirmation of the usefulness of these interventions in other cases and investigating whether these cognitive techniques can be extended to "real world" applications are the logical next steps.

摘要

众所周知,当检索或其他形式的测试紧随新信息的获取之后进行时,健康受试者的长期记忆会得到改善(Roediger 和 Karpicke,2006)。目前尚不清楚这种早期干预是否会减轻 ALF 的影响,ALF 是一种早期保留正常但长时间间隔后记忆急剧下降的情况。一项不同的行为干预(即在更长的延迟后插入回忆一个故事)被发现可以防止单个 ALF 病例的随后记忆丧失(Jansari、Davis、McGibbon、Firminger 和 Kapur,2010;McGibbon 和 Jansari,2013),但尚未得到复制。在本研究中,我们试图测试早期复习和后期插入回忆对长期记忆的有效性。将 3 名 ALF 患者和 10 名匹配的健康男性(平均年龄 67 岁;平均教育年限 15 年)进行比较,以评估 3 种早期干预条件下的故事回忆。有两种早期复习条件:重复回忆(在最初的 30 分钟间隔内再请求 2 次回忆)和重复回忆加讨论(在最初的 30 分钟间隔内再请求 2 次回忆并进行讨论),以及对照条件,即在最初的 30 分钟内没有进行额外的复习。在 0 分钟、30 分钟、1 天、1 周和 4 周时测试对 6 个故事(每个条件 2 个)的记忆。此外,为了评估在 1 周和 4 周延迟之间进行额外检索(“增强回忆”)的可能维持效果,在 2 周延迟时回忆每个早期干预条件下的 1 个故事。与 ALF 的特征模式一致,非参数统计显示在 0 分钟或 30 分钟的回忆中没有组间差异。对于对照故事,ALF 组的回忆在 24 小时后受到影响。对于早期复习条件下的任何一个故事,患者的记忆保留情况都更好,直到 4 周的回忆都保持在正常范围内。在 2 周时进行的“增强回忆”有助于患者在 4 周时的记忆保留,只有那些在 2 周时回忆的故事患者的平均回忆仍保持在正常范围内。这些结果表明,包括在最初几分钟内进行早期复习和在稍后的时间点进行增强回忆在内的行为干预有助于预防 ALF。在其他病例中确认这些干预的有效性,并研究这些认知技术是否可以扩展到“现实世界”应用,是合乎逻辑的下一步。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验