Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jul;51(8):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 4.
Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is the rapid loss of newly acquired memories over days to weeks despite normal retention at standard (~30 min) intervals. It has recently been described in association with epilepsy, particularly the syndrome of Transient Epileptic Amnesia (TEA). The cognitive mechanisms underlying ALF remain uncertain, but disruption either of memory acquisition or consolidation processes has been postulated. To arbitrate between these accounts, we reanalysed data from an existing word-list recall data set to investigate whether ALF can be observed for words learned under precisely matched conditions in TEA patients and controls. We reanalysed the data of 24 patients with TEA and 24 matched healthy controls who learnt a 15-item word list to a learning criterion of 90% with a minimum of five learning trials. Free recall of the words was probed at delays of 30 min and 1 week and 3 weeks after learning. In addition, a 'yes-no' recognition test was conducted after the 3-week free recall. Forgetting rates across the first 30 min delay and the subsequent 1 week and 3 week delay were compared between patients and controls. To ensure that learning conditions were closely matched between patients and control participants, we excluded exceptionally fast (N(TEA)=1, N(controls)=4) and slow (N(TEA)=6, N(controls)=2) learners. Furthermore, we analysed only words that were presented five or six times during learning and retrieved successfully on four or five occasions during learning. Recall performance on the last learning trial and 30 min after acquisition were indistinguishable between TEA patients and controls. Over the delay interval of 30 min to 1 week, however, accelerated forgetting of this newly learned verbal material was observed in TEA patients. This severe forgetting is also reflected in the three-week recognition test, where TEA patients performed significantly worse than controls. Moreover, whereas recall on the last learning trial correlated significantly with the 30 min delayed recall in both groups, recall on the last learning trial correlated significantly with 1 week and 3 week delayed recall only in the controls. In both groups, the three-week free recall performance correlated with the three-week recognition test. Patients with TEA demonstrate ALF even for verbal material that is learned under precisely matched conditions. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that ALF represents a disruption of memory consolidation rather than an acquisition deficit.
加速长期遗忘(ALF)是指新获得的记忆在几天到几周内迅速丧失,尽管在标准(约 30 分钟)间隔内正常保留。最近在癫痫症中,特别是短暂性癫痫性遗忘综合征(TEA)中已经描述了这种现象。ALF 的认知机制仍不确定,但有人推测,无论是记忆获取还是巩固过程的中断都会导致这种情况。为了在这些解释之间做出裁决,我们重新分析了现有词汇列表回忆数据集的数据,以调查在 TEA 患者和对照组中是否可以观察到在精确匹配条件下学习的单词的 ALF。我们重新分析了 24 名 TEA 患者和 24 名匹配的健康对照者的数据,这些患者和对照者在学习了 15 项单词列表后,以 90%的学习标准进行了至少 5 次学习试验。在学习后 30 分钟、1 周和 3 周时探测单词的自由回忆。此外,在 3 周的自由回忆后进行了“是/否”识别测试。在患者和对照组之间比较了前 30 分钟延迟和随后 1 周和 3 周延迟的遗忘率。为了确保患者和对照组的学习条件非常匹配,我们排除了异常快速(TEA=1,对照组=4)和缓慢(TEA=6,对照组=2)的学习者。此外,我们仅分析了在学习过程中呈现 5 次或 6 次且在学习过程中成功检索 4 次或 5 次的单词。TEA 患者和对照组在最后一次学习试验和获得后 30 分钟的回忆表现没有区别。然而,在 30 分钟到 1 周的延迟间隔内,TEA 患者的这种新学习的言语材料出现了加速遗忘。这种严重的遗忘也反映在 3 周的识别测试中,TEA 患者的表现明显比对照组差。此外,尽管在两组中,最后一次学习试验的回忆与 30 分钟延迟的回忆显著相关,但仅在对照组中,最后一次学习试验的回忆与 1 周和 3 周延迟的回忆显著相关。在两组中,3 周的自由回忆表现与 3 周的识别测试相关。即使是在精确匹配条件下学习的言语材料,TEA 患者也表现出 ALF。这些结果与 ALF 代表记忆巩固而不是获取缺陷的假设一致。