• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Short-term Clinical Efficacy of Electric Pudendal Nerve Stimulation on Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Disease: A Pilot Research.阴部神经电刺激治疗神经源性下尿路疾病的短期临床疗效:一项初步研究。
Urology. 2018 Feb;112:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.047. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation versus Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation in Treating Female Idiopathic Urgency Urinary Incontinence.阴部神经电刺激与经阴道电刺激治疗女性特发性急迫性尿失禁的疗效比较
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1496-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.065. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treating Female Stress Incontinence.阴部神经电刺激治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效
Urology. 2016 May;91:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Simultaneous perineal ultrasound and vaginal pressure measurement prove the action of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation in treating female stress incontinence.经会阴超声联合阴道压力测定证实电刺激阴部神经治疗女性压力性尿失禁的作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1338-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11029.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
The short-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation versus intravesical instillation for the urethral pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.电刺激阴部神经与膀胱内灌注治疗尿道疼痛综合征的短期疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3993-3998. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03698-2. Epub 2021 May 2.
6
Bilateral electrical pudendal nerve stimulation as additional therapy for lower urinary tract dysfunction when stage II sacral neuromodulator fails: a case report.二期骶神经调节失败后,双侧阴部神经电刺激作为治疗下尿路功能障碍的附加疗法:病例报告。
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00808-5.
7
Long-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for urgency-frequency syndrome in women.女性急迫性尿频综合征的阴部神经电刺激长期疗效
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2223-7. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
8
Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.胫骨神经刺激治疗神经源性下尿路功能障碍:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
9
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.经皮神经电刺激治疗神经源性下尿路功能障碍:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Evaluation of constipation after parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction--a pilot study.经骶皮神经电刺激治疗儿童下尿路功能障碍后便秘的评估——一项初步研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Oct;9(5):622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving types of pudendal neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.用于下尿路功能障碍的不断发展的阴部神经调节类型。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):82-88. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.86. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Perspectives on the Therapeutic Effects of Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review.盆腔电刺激治疗效果的观点:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114035.
3
The short-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation versus intravesical instillation for the urethral pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.
电刺激阴部神经与膀胱内灌注治疗尿道疼痛综合征的短期疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3993-3998. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03698-2. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Bilateral electrical pudendal nerve stimulation as additional therapy for lower urinary tract dysfunction when stage II sacral neuromodulator fails: a case report.二期骶神经调节失败后,双侧阴部神经电刺激作为治疗下尿路功能障碍的附加疗法:病例报告。
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00808-5.
5
Site-Specific Neuromodulation of Detrusor and External Urethral Sphincter by Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation.硬膜外脊髓刺激对逼尿肌和尿道外括约肌的位点特异性神经调节
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;14:47. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00047. eCollection 2020.
6
Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bladder dysfunction: technology update.电刺激治疗膀胱功能障碍:技术更新
Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Sep 11;12:337-345. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S179898. eCollection 2019.

阴部神经电刺激治疗神经源性下尿路疾病的短期临床疗效:一项初步研究。

Short-term Clinical Efficacy of Electric Pudendal Nerve Stimulation on Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Disease: A Pilot Research.

作者信息

Li Tian, Feng Xiaoming, Lv Jianwei, Cai Tianyao, Wang Siyou

机构信息

Acupuncture Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

The Clinical Research Section, Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Urology. 2018 Feb;112:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.047. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.047
PMID:29175451
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS) vs anogenital electrical stimulation (AES) for neurogenic lower urinary tract disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty eligible participants were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to the test group of 40 patients and the control group of 20. The test group was treated with EPNS and the control group was treated with AES. After 12 sessions of treatment, therapeutic effects were evaluated based on self-assessed questionnaire scores. All patients with a residual urine volume >50 mL were also assessed by the post-treatment residual urine volume.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, the median symptom score and the quality of life score were 11 (range 3-23) and 4.26 (range 1.00-5.81) in the test group, and the median post-treatment residual urine volume was 46 (range 0-223) mL. By contrast, the median severity of symptoms and quality of life scores were 15 (range 8-33) and 3.84 (range 0.89-5.84) in the control group, and the median post-treatment residual urine volume was 105 (range 28-340) mL. Significant differences between the test group and the control group could be observed in the post-treatment symptom score, the quality of life score, and the residual urine volume (with P = .005, P <.001, P = .02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with AES, EPNS is more effective in treating neurogenic lower urinary tract disease in the short term.

摘要

目的

比较阴部神经电刺激(EPNS)与肛门生殖器电刺激(AES)治疗神经源性下尿路疾病的短期疗效。

患者与方法

60名符合条件的参与者按2:1的比例随机分为40例患者的试验组和20例患者的对照组。试验组采用EPNS治疗,对照组采用AES治疗。治疗12次后,根据自我评估问卷评分评估治疗效果。所有残余尿量>50 mL的患者还通过治疗后的残余尿量进行评估。

结果

治疗结束时,试验组的症状评分中位数和生活质量评分分别为11(范围3 - 23)和4.26(范围1.00 - 5.81),治疗后的残余尿量中位数为46(范围0 - 223)mL。相比之下,对照组的症状严重程度中位数和生活质量评分分别为15(范围8 - 33)和3.84(范围0.89 - 5.84),治疗后的残余尿量中位数为105(范围28 - 340)mL。试验组与对照组在治疗后的症状评分、生活质量评分和残余尿量方面存在显著差异(P分别为0.005、<0.001、0.02)。

结论

与AES相比,EPNS在短期内治疗神经源性下尿路疾病更有效。