Bertrand Kim, Raymond Marie-Hélène, Miller William C, Martin Ginis Kathleen A, Demers Louise
From the Université de Montréal, Faculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (KB, M-HR, LD); Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (WCM); Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (WCM); School of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada (KAMG); and Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (LD).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):894-903. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000836.
In this systematic literature review, we examined whether and how walking aids (i.e., canes, crutches, walkers, and rollators) enable activity and participation among adults with physical disabilities. Medline, Embase, all EBM reviews, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were used to identify studies published since 2008. Quantitative and qualitative designs were included. Data regarding participants, assistive device use, outcome measures, and domains of participation were extracted. Two reviewers independently rated the level of evidence and methodological quality of the studies. Outcomes were categorized per types of walking aids and activity and participation domains. Thirteen studies were included. Two studies involved canes, four pertained to rollators, and seven dealt with multiple types of walking aids. Mobility was the most frequently examined domain of activity and participation. Both negative and positive results were found. Negative outcomes were linked to the physical characteristics of the device, the use, environment, and personal reluctance. When incorporated in daily life, walking aids were found to enable several domains of activity and participation. Whether walking aids facilitate activity and participation may depend on the user's ability to overcome obstacles and integrate them in daily life. More high-quality research is needed to draw conclusions about their effectiveness.
在这项系统文献综述中,我们研究了助行器具(即手杖、拐杖、步行器和滚动助行器)是否以及如何使身体残疾的成年人能够进行活动和参与。我们使用了医学数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、所有循证医学综述、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)以及科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)来识别自2008年以来发表的研究。纳入了定量和定性设计的研究。提取了有关参与者、辅助设备使用、结局指标和参与领域的数据。两名评审员独立评定研究的证据水平和方法学质量。结局按助行器具类型以及活动和参与领域进行分类。共纳入13项研究。两项研究涉及手杖,四项涉及滚动助行器,七项涉及多种类型的助行器具。活动能力是活动和参与方面研究最频繁的领域。研究结果既有负面的也有正面的。负面结果与设备的物理特性、使用情况、环境以及个人意愿有关。当融入日常生活中时,发现助行器具能够使多个活动和参与领域成为可能。助行器具是否有助于活动和参与可能取决于使用者克服障碍并将其融入日常生活的能力。需要更多高质量的研究来得出关于其有效性的结论。