Suppr超能文献

移动设备用户如何将他们的设备融入职业表现?一项叙述性文献综述。

How do mobility device users integrate their devices into occupational performance? A narrative literature review.

作者信息

Helle Tina, Brandt Åse, Larsen Stina Meyer

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy and Research and Development, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Dec;86(12):794-804. doi: 10.1177/03080226231184989. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge about how mobility devices are integrated into occupational performance is important to improve participation in daily life among users and assistive technology provision. This study aimed to identify and synthesise literature on how mobility device users integrate their devices into occupational performance.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted with a systematic search in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SocINDEX for scientific, original, peer-reviewed journal publications in the English or Scandinavian languages. Following search terms were used: mobility devices, occupational performance and synonyms. Publications were screened and read, and data were extracted by two authors independently.

RESULTS

A total of 4088 hits led to the identification of six publications. Two categories were identified: (1) how mobility devices are integrated into occupational performance and (2) for what types of occupations beyond mobility are mobility devices used for; seven types were revealed.

CONCLUSION

Mobility devices are integrated into occupations in unique ways to the individual users, shaping how occupations are performed and are used for different types of occupations beyond mobility. Since mobility device use is situational, it is suggested to investigate assistive technology use, applying a transactional perspective to improve assistive technology provision to increase fulfilment of users' needs and preferences.

摘要

引言

了解移动设备如何融入职业表现对于提高用户参与日常生活以及辅助技术的提供非常重要。本研究旨在识别和综合有关移动设备用户如何将其设备融入职业表现的文献。

方法

进行了一项叙述性综述,在PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO和SocINDEX中进行系统检索,以查找英文或斯堪的纳维亚语的科学、原创、同行评审期刊出版物。使用了以下检索词:移动设备、职业表现及同义词。对出版物进行筛选和阅读,数据由两位作者独立提取。

结果

共检索到4088条结果,最终确定了6篇出版物。确定了两类:(1)移动设备如何融入职业表现;(2)移动设备用于除移动之外的哪些职业类型;共揭示了七种类型。

结论

移动设备以独特的方式融入个体用户的职业中,塑造了职业的执行方式,并用于移动之外的不同职业类型。由于移动设备的使用是情境性的,建议从交互视角研究辅助技术的使用,以改善辅助技术的提供,从而更好地满足用户的需求和偏好。

相似文献

1
How do mobility device users integrate their devices into occupational performance? A narrative literature review.
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Dec;86(12):794-804. doi: 10.1177/03080226231184989. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Disabled-by-design: effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices - a systematic review.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):604-622. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2111723. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 May;16(4):362-376. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1650300. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Perspectives on and use of assistive technology by persons with MS: a scoping review.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Feb;20(2):304-320. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2385052. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
7
Wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: a gateway to freedom.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(3):370-381. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1768303. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Assistive Devices for Addressing Mobility Impairments Linked to Cancer and Cancer Treatment: An Expert Perspective.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug;40(4):151683. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151683. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
9
Priorities when designing a service-focused delivery model for mobility devices: a systematic review.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Oct;19(7):2442-2453. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2313077. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Mar 26;4:5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8. eCollection 2019.
3
Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2018 Jun;48(6):e12931. doi: 10.1111/eci.12931. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Sep 4;1:12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2. eCollection 2016.
5
Walking Aids for Enabling Activity and Participation: A Systematic Review.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):894-903. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000836.
6
Technology and Occupation: Past, Present, and the Next 100 Years of Theory and Practice.
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Nov/Dec;71(6):7106150010p1-7106150010p15. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.716003.
7
Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process-A systematic review.
Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82-97. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
The meaning ascribed to wheeled mobility devices by individuals who use wheelchairs and scooters: a metasynthesis.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Apr;13(3):253-262. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1306594. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
MAPx (Mobility Aid Personalization): examining why older adults "pimp their ride" and the impact of doing so.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul;12(5):512-518. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2016.1158327. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Walking on the edge: meanings of living in an ageing body and using a walker in everyday life - a phenomenological hermeneutic study.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2013 May;8(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00334.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验