Pagano Anna, Gubner Noah, Tajima Barbara, Yip Deborah, Henderson Catherine, Guydish Joseph
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Oakland, CA, USA.
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
J Drug Issues. 2017 Jul;47(3):433-447. doi: 10.1177/0022042617699196. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packs have been tested among diverse groups at high risk for tobacco use. However, little is known about the effectiveness of GWL interventions for persons with substance use disorders, whose smoking prevalence is 3 to 4 times that of the general population. After an experimental study which exposed clients in residential addiction treatment to GWLs for 30 days, we conducted five focus groups with trial participants ( = 33) to explore how exposure to the labels may have impacted their readiness to quit smoking. Focus group interviews were analyzed thematically. Interviewees reported that GWLs were more effective than text-based warnings for increasing quit intentions due to greater cognitive and emotional impact. Male and female interviewees expressed gender-specific reactions to the labels. Addiction treatment programs are a strategic site for GWL and other tobacco interventions due to the tobacco-vulnerable populations they serve.
香烟包装上的图形警示标签(GWLs)已在各类烟草使用高危人群中进行了测试。然而,对于物质使用障碍患者群体,GWL干预措施的效果却知之甚少,而这类人群的吸烟率是普通人群的3至4倍。在一项实验研究中,让住院成瘾治疗的患者接触GWLs达30天之后,我们与试验参与者(n = 33)进行了五次焦点小组访谈,以探讨接触这些标签可能如何影响他们戒烟的意愿。对焦点小组访谈进行了主题分析。受访者报告称,由于具有更大的认知和情感影响,GWLs在增强戒烟意愿方面比文字警告更有效。男性和女性受访者对这些标签表达了特定性别的反应。由于成瘾治疗项目所服务的是易受烟草影响的人群,所以它们是实施GWL及其他烟草干预措施的战略场所。