Coletti Daniel J, Brunette Mary, John Majnu, Kane John M, Malhotra Anil K, Robinson Delbert G
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
The Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY;
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Nov;41(6):1256-65. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv122. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Virtually no research has examined the responses of youth with recent-onset psychosis (ROP) to smoking-related health warnings. We examined predictors of response and tested hypotheses that participants with ROP would (a) assess warnings as less effective than a healthy comparison (HC) group, and (b) assess video warnings as more effective than pictures. ROP participants (n = 69) had <2 years of prior antipsychotic treatment; the HC group (n = 79) had no major mental illness. Participants viewed 10 pictorial warnings, 8 videos depicting similar messages, and were interviewed regarding tobacco use, health literacy, and smoking knowledge. We assessed response at baseline and at 4-week follow-up. ROP participants were more likely than HC to smoke tobacco (49.3% vs 10.1%) and had lower levels of health literacy and smoking-related knowledge. Cannabis was used by 46.4% of ROP participants. Effectiveness ratings were high for both picture and video warnings with no differences between media. ROP participants compared to HC and nonsmokers compared to smokers were more likely to perceive warnings as effective. Effectiveness was associated with negative affect and greater emotional arousal. We assessed 33 smokers at follow-up; 5 (15%) identified as nonsmokers, 15 (45%) made a quit attempt, and 16 (49%) reported that the warnings influenced their smoking. Results indicate that young people with psychotic disorders respond favorably to health warnings. Effective messages depict health consequences clearly, elicit negative emotions, and may impact smoking behavior. Future research is needed to understand the effects of mode of presentation and message comprehension on smoking behavior.
几乎没有研究考察过近期发病的精神病(ROP)青年对与吸烟相关的健康警告的反应。我们研究了反应的预测因素,并检验了以下假设:ROP参与者(a)会认为警告的效果不如健康对照组(HC),以及(b)会认为视频警告比图片警告更有效。ROP参与者(n = 69)接受抗精神病治疗的时间不到2年;HC组(n = 79)没有重大精神疾病。参与者观看了10个图片警告、8个传达类似信息的视频,并接受了关于烟草使用、健康素养和吸烟知识的访谈。我们在基线和4周随访时评估了反应。ROP参与者吸烟的可能性比HC组更高(49.3%对10.1%),且健康素养和吸烟相关知识水平较低。46.4%的ROP参与者使用大麻。图片和视频警告的有效性评分都很高,不同媒介之间没有差异。与HC组相比,ROP参与者,以及与吸烟者相比,不吸烟者更有可能认为警告是有效的。有效性与负面影响和更高的情绪唤起有关。我们在随访时评估了33名吸烟者;5人(15%)认定为不吸烟者,15人(45%)尝试戒烟,16人(49%)报告警告影响了他们的吸烟行为。结果表明,患有精神疾病的年轻人对健康警告反应良好。有效的信息清晰地描绘了健康后果,引发负面情绪,并可能影响吸烟行为。需要进一步的研究来了解呈现方式和信息理解对吸烟行为的影响。