Bakke Åsne, Cooper John G, Thue Geir, Skeie Svein, Carlsen Siri, Dalen Ingvild, Løvaas Karianne Fjeld, Madsen Tone Vonheim, Oord Ellen Renate, Berg Tore Julsrud, Claudi Tor, Tran Anh Thi, Gjelsvik Bjørn, Jenum Anne Karen, Sandberg Sverre
Department of Endocrinology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Nov 8;5(1):e000459. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459. eCollection 2017.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type 2 diabetes in selected areas (n=9464 in 2014, n=5463 in 2005). Quality of care was assessed based on key recommendations in national guidelines. Differences in clinical performance between 2005 and 2014 were assessed in regression models adjusting for age, sex, counties and clustering within general practices. RESULTS: Treatment targets were achieved in a higher proportion of patients in 2014 compared with 2005: hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol) in 62.8% vs 54.3%, blood pressure ≤135/80 mm Hg in 44.9% vs 36.6%, and total cholesterol ≤4.5 mmol/L in 49.9% vs 33.5% (all adjusted P≤0.001). Regarding screening procedures for microvascular complications, fewer patients had recorded an eye examination (61.0% vs 71.5%, adjusted P<0.001), whereas more patients underwent monofilament test (25.9% vs 18.7%, adjusted P<0.001). Testing for albuminuria remained low (30.3%) in 2014. A still high percentage were current smokers (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate improvements in risk factor control for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice during the last decade, which are similar to improvements reported in other countries. We report major gaps in the performance of recommended screening procedures to detect microvascular complications. The proportion of daily smokers remains high. We suggest incentives to promote further improvements in diabetes care in Norway.
目的:评估全科医疗中2型糖尿病护理的现状以及2005年至2014年间护理质量的变化,并确定糖尿病护理中需要改进的领域。 研究设计与方法:进行了两项横断面调查,纳入选定地区的2型糖尿病患者(2014年n = 9464,2005年n = 5463)。根据国家指南中的关键建议评估护理质量。在对年龄、性别、县以及全科医疗中的聚类进行调整的回归模型中评估2005年和2014年临床绩效的差异。 结果:与2005年相比,2014年达到治疗目标的患者比例更高:糖化血红蛋白≤7.0%(≤53 mmol/mol)的患者比例为62.8% 对54.3%,血压≤135/80 mmHg的患者比例为44.9% 对36.6%,总胆固醇≤4.5 mmol/L的患者比例为49.9% 对33.5%(所有调整后P≤0.001)。关于微血管并发症的筛查程序,进行眼科检查的患者减少(61.0%对71.5%,调整后P<0.001),而进行单丝试验的患者增多(25.9%对18.7%,调整后P<0.001)。2014年白蛋白尿检测率仍然较低(30.3%)。当前吸烟者的比例仍然很高(22.7%)。 结论:我们发现过去十年中全科医疗中2型糖尿病患者的危险因素控制有适度改善,这与其他国家报告的改善情况相似。我们报告了在推荐的检测微血管并发症筛查程序的执行方面存在重大差距。日常吸烟者的比例仍然很高。我们建议采取激励措施以促进挪威糖尿病护理的进一步改善。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008-11-20
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025-6
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024-5-23
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024-1-2
Diabetes Care. 2017-1
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016-12
BMC Endocr Disord. 2016-2-17