Silverstein Michael J, Alperin Samuel, Faraone Stephen V, Kessler Ronald C, Adler Lenard A
Department of Psychiatry, New York, USA.
Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, USA.
Fam Pract. 2018 May 23;35(3):336-341. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx115.
To examine the test-retest reliability of the DSM-IV Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) v1.1 Screener in adults without ADHD. Prior studies have not examined test-retest reliability of the Screener in non-ADHD controls.
Subjects completed the Screener in a primary care physician (PCP) waiting room (T1); those who screened negative for ADHD (n = 104) (<4/6 significant Screener items) symptoms were further assessed on the phone (T2). T2 included phone administration of the full ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist (which contains the six items from the Screener). Spearman's correlations and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between T1 and T2 were calculated for the total Screener score and for each Screener item. McNemar-Bowker tests were conducted for the Screener total score and each item to check for significant changes from T1 to T2.
Screener T1 and T2 total scores were significantly correlated (Spearman's rho = 0.78, P < 0.0001), as were individual items. Correlations remained significant when controlling for a variety of demographic factors and psychiatric conditions. Confirming the significant Spearman correlations, ICCs for Screener total score and each item were also significant (ICC = 0.75, P < 0.0001). The McNemar-Bowker tests showed no significant differences for Screener total score and for the IA items; however, the H-I items were somewhat higher at T1 versus T2.
The DSM-IV ASRS v1.1 Screener has high test-retest reliability in patients without ADHD.
检验《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)成人注意力缺陷多动障碍自我报告量表(ASRS)v1.1筛查版在无注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成年人中的重测信度。既往研究未检验该筛查版在非ADHD对照人群中的重测信度。
受试者在初级保健医生(PCP)候诊室完成筛查版测试(T1);ADHD筛查呈阴性(n = 104)(筛查版显著项目<4/6项)的受试者通过电话进一步评估(T2)。T2包括通过电话使用完整的ASRS v1.1症状清单(其中包含筛查版的六个项目)。计算T1和T2之间筛查版总分及每个筛查项目的斯皮尔曼相关性和组内相关系数(ICC)。对筛查版总分及每个项目进行麦克尼马尔-鲍克检验,以检查从T1到T2是否有显著变化。
筛查版T1和T2总分显著相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数rho = 0.78,P < 0.0001),各项目也是如此。在控制各种人口统计学因素和精神疾病状况后,相关性仍然显著。证实斯皮尔曼相关性显著,筛查版总分及每个项目的ICC也显著(ICC = 0.75,P < 0.0001)。麦克尼马尔-鲍克检验显示,筛查版总分及IA项目无显著差异;然而,H-I项目在T1时略高于T2。
DSM-IV ASRS v1.1筛查版在无ADHD患者中具有较高的重测信度。