Khangure Simon R, Benhabib Hadas, Machnowska Matylda, Fox Allan J, Grönlund Christer, Herod Wendy, Maggisano Robert, Sjöberg Anders, Wester Per, Hojjat Seyed-Parsa, Hopyan Julia, Aviv Richard I, Johansson Elias
Department of Medical Imaging, Neuroradiology Division, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroimaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Neuroradiology. 2018 Jan;60(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1938-4. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
Carotid near-occlusion is a tight atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) resulting in decrease in diameter of the vessel lumen distal to the stenosis. Near-occlusions can be classified as with or without full collapse, and may have high peak systolic velocity (PSV) across the stenosis, mimicking conventional > 50% carotid artery stenosis. We aimed to determine how frequently near-occlusions have high PSV in the stenosis and determine how accurately carotid Doppler ultrasound can distinguish high-velocity near-occlusion from conventional stenosis.
Included patients had near-occlusion or conventional stenosis with carotid ultrasound and CT angiogram (CTA) performed within 30 days of each other. CTA examinations were analyzed by two blinded expert readers. Velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries were recorded. Mean velocity, pulsatility index, and ratios were calculated, giving 12 Doppler parameters for analysis.
Of 136 patients, 82 had conventional stenosis and 54 had near-occlusion on CTA. Of near-occlusions, 40 (74%) had high PSV (≥ 125 cm/s) across the stenosis. Ten Doppler parameters significantly differed between conventional stenosis and high-velocity near-occlusion groups. However, no parameter was highly sensitive and specific to separate the groups.
Near-occlusions frequently have high PSV across the stenosis, particularly those without full collapse. Carotid Doppler ultrasound does not seem able to distinguish conventional stenosis from high-velocity near-occlusion. These findings question the use of ultrasound alone for preoperative imaging evaluation.
颈动脉近闭塞是颈内动脉(ICA)的严重动脉粥样硬化狭窄,导致狭窄远端血管腔直径减小。近闭塞可分为伴有或不伴有完全塌陷,且狭窄处可能有较高的收缩期峰值流速(PSV),类似于传统的>50%颈动脉狭窄。我们旨在确定近闭塞在狭窄处出现高PSV的频率,并确定颈动脉多普勒超声能多准确地将高速近闭塞与传统狭窄区分开来。
纳入的患者在30天内先后进行了颈动脉超声和CT血管造影(CTA)检查,存在近闭塞或传统狭窄。CTA检查由两名不知情的专家阅片者进行分析。记录颈内动脉和颈总动脉的流速。计算平均流速、搏动指数和比值,得出12个多普勒参数用于分析。
136例患者中,CTA显示82例为传统狭窄,54例为近闭塞。在近闭塞患者中,40例(74%)在狭窄处有高PSV(≥125 cm/s)。传统狭窄组和高速近闭塞组之间有10个多普勒参数存在显著差异。然而,没有一个参数对区分这两组具有高敏感性和特异性。
近闭塞在狭窄处经常出现高PSV,尤其是那些没有完全塌陷的情况。颈动脉多普勒超声似乎无法区分传统狭窄和高速近闭塞。这些发现对单独使用超声进行术前影像学评估提出了质疑。