Suppr超能文献

测量血友病患者的活动和参与:常用工具的系统评价。

Measuring activities and participation in persons with haemophilia: A systematic review of commonly used instruments.

机构信息

Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2018 Mar;24(2):e33-e49. doi: 10.1111/hae.13367. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring clinical outcome in persons with haemophilia (PWH) is essential in order to provide optimal treatment for individual patients and compare effectiveness of treatment strategies. Experience with measurement of activities and participation in haemophilia is limited and consensus on preferred tools is lacking.

AIM

The aim of this study was to give a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of a selection of commonly used tools developed to assess activities and participation in PWH.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for articles that reported on reliability, validity or responsiveness of predetermined measurement tools (5 self-reported and 4 performance based measurement tools). Methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the COSMIN checklist. Best evidence synthesis was used to summarize evidence on the measurement properties.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 3453 unique hits. Forty-two articles were included. The self-reported Haemophilia Acitivity List (HAL), Pediatric HAL (PedHAL) and the performance based Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH) were studied most extensively. Methodological quality of the studies was limited. Measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness have been insufficiently evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Albeit based on limited evidence, the measurement properties of the PedHAL, HAL and FISH are currently considered most satisfactory. Further research needs to focus on measurement error, responsiveness, interpretability and cross-cultural validity of the self-reported tools and validity of performance based tools which are able to assess limitations in sports and leisure activities.

摘要

简介

为了为个体患者提供最佳治疗,并比较治疗策略的有效性,监测血友病患者(PWH)的临床结局至关重要。在血友病患者活动和参与度的测量方面经验有限,并且缺乏对首选工具的共识。

目的

本研究旨在全面概述常用于评估 PWH 活动和参与度的一系列常用工具的测量特性。

方法

电子数据库中检索了报告预定测量工具(5 种自我报告工具和 4 种基于表现的测量工具)的可靠性、有效性或反应性的文章。根据 COSMIN 清单评估研究的方法学质量。使用最佳证据综合来总结测量特性的证据。

结果

搜索结果产生了 3453 个独特的命中。纳入了 42 篇文章。自我报告的血友病活动清单(HAL)、儿科 HAL(PedHAL)和基于表现的血友病功能独立性评分(FISH)研究最多。研究的方法学质量有限。测量误差、跨文化有效性和反应性评估不足。

结论

尽管基于有限的证据,但目前认为 PedHAL、HAL 和 FISH 的测量特性最令人满意。进一步的研究需要集中在自我报告工具的测量误差、反应性、可解释性和跨文化有效性以及能够评估运动和休闲活动限制的基于表现的工具的有效性上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验