Suppr超能文献

美国国家综合癌症网络常见恶性肿瘤患者指南的文献计量学分析。

Literacy analysis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network patient guidelines for the most common malignancies in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):769-774. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31113. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer information is of critical interest to the public. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) offers a series of comprehensive patient guidelines on the management of the most common cancer diagnoses. This study was aimed at assessing the health literacy demands of NCCN patient guidelines for the most common malignancies in the United States.

METHODS

The American Cancer Society's most common malignancies by annual incidence in the United States and their corresponding NCCN patient guidelines were identified. Four validated tools were used to evaluate literacy levels: 1) the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, 2) the Peter Mosenthal and Irwin Kirsch readability formula (PMOSE/IKIRSCH), 3) the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and 4) the Clear Communication Index from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

RESULTS

The average reading grade level was 10.3, which was higher than the recommended 6th-grade level. The average PMOSE/IKIRSCH score was 11; this corresponded to moderate complexity and required some college-level education for interpretation. Only 1 tool, the PEMAT, yielded scores above the benchmarks for high-quality materials. The PEMAT's understandability, actionability, and overall scores were 94%, 83%, and 91%, respectively. The average CDC index was 85%, which was below the recommended 90% for an appropriate health literacy demand.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the assessment indicates high demand scores for the readability and complexity of the NCCN patient guidelines and thus that the materials are not quite suitable for the general US adult population. Further input from patient focus groups to address appropriateness and usefulness is critical. Cancer 2018;124:769-74. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

癌症信息对公众具有重要意义。美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)提供了一系列针对最常见癌症诊断的综合患者指南。本研究旨在评估 NCCN 患者指南对美国最常见恶性肿瘤的健康素养要求。

方法

确定了美国按年发病率最常见的癌症以及相应的 NCCN 患者指南。使用了四种经过验证的工具来评估读写水平:1)Gobbledygook 简易量表,2)Peter Mosenthal 和 Irwin Kirsch 可读性公式(PMOSE/IKIRSCH),3)患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT),以及 4)疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的清晰沟通指数。

结果

平均阅读水平为 10.3 级,高于推荐的 6 级水平。平均 PMOSE/IKIRSCH 得分为 11;这对应于中等复杂程度,需要一定的大学水平的解释。只有一种工具,即 PEMAT,得分高于高质量材料的基准。PEMAT 的理解性、可操作性和总体得分分别为 94%、83%和 91%。平均 CDC 指数为 85%,低于适当健康素养要求的 90%。

结论

总体而言,评估表明 NCCN 患者指南的可读性和复杂性要求很高,因此这些材料不太适合美国普通成年人群体。从患者焦点小组获得进一步的投入来解决适宜性和有用性至关重要。癌症 2018;124:769-74. © 2017 美国癌症协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验