Suppr超能文献

厌氧消化与粪肥喷射相结合可减少粪肥在施用过程中对土壤的恶臭排放。

Anaerobic digestion coupled with digestate injection reduced odour emissions from soil during manure distribution.

机构信息

Gruppo Ricicla - DiSAA, Università degli Studi di Milano, Soil and Env. Lab, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Gruppo Ricicla - DiSAA, Università degli Studi di Milano, Soil and Env. Lab, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.249. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

Abstract

This work aimed to measure the odour impact of untreated cow and pig slurries and treated (digestate and liquid fraction of digestate) manures when they were used on soil at a field scale, while also testing different spreading methods, i.e. surface vs. injection. Five experiments were performed in 2012-2016 on different farms. Odours were quantitatively (specific odour emission rate - SOER) (OUmh) measured by using dynamic olfactometry and qualitatively, i.e. to obtain an "odour fingerprint", by using an electronic nose (EN). Anaerobic digestion was effective in allowing the reduction of potential odour emission from digestates, so that when they were dosed on soil, odours emitted were much lower than those from soils on which untreated slurries were used. Slurries/digestate injection reduced much more odour emitted by soils so that SOER tended to become more similar to that of the control (untreated soil) although the odours were slightly greater. Odour fingerprint data indicated that there was a direct correlation between SOER and odour fingerprints. This was due to the ability of EN to detect ammonia, S-compounds and methane that were (the first two mainly), also, responsible for odours. Very good regression was found for Log SOER and EN by using a Partial Least Square (PLS) approach (R=0.73; R=0.66; P<0.01) for matrices used to fertilize soils in lab tests. Unfortunately, regression was not so good when odour data from field experiments on soil were used, so that EN cannot be proposed to replace olfactometry. EN fingerprints for control (Blank) and injected organic matrices were virtually identical, due to the creation of cavities in the soil during the injection that decreased the treated surface. Anaerobic digestion and subsequent digestate injection allowed us to reduce odour impact, avoiding annoyance to local inhabitants.

摘要

本研究旨在测量未处理的奶牛和猪粪浆以及经过处理(消化物和消化物的液体部分)的粪肥在田间规模上施用于土壤时的气味影响,同时测试不同的施用方法,即表面施用与注射施用。2012-2016 年在不同的农场进行了五次实验。使用动态嗅觉计通过定量(特定气味排放率-SOER)(OUmh)测量气味,通过电子鼻(EN)定性测量,即获得“气味指纹”。厌氧消化有效地减少了消化物潜在气味排放,因此当它们施用于土壤时,排放的气味比未处理的粪浆施用于土壤时低得多。粪浆/消化物注射减少了土壤排放的更多气味,因此 SOER 趋于更类似于对照(未处理的土壤),尽管气味稍大。气味指纹数据表明,SOER 与气味指纹之间存在直接相关性。这是由于 EN 能够检测氨、S 化合物和甲烷(主要是前两种),它们也是气味的主要来源。通过偏最小二乘法(PLS)方法,对用于实验室土壤施肥的矩阵进行 Log SOER 和 EN 的回归分析,得到了非常好的结果(R=0.73;R=0.66;P<0.01)。不幸的是,当使用田间土壤实验的气味数据时,回归效果不佳,因此 EN 不能替代嗅觉计。由于在注射过程中土壤中形成了空腔,处理表面减小,因此对照(空白)和注射有机基质的 EN 指纹几乎相同。厌氧消化和随后的消化物注射允许我们减少气味影响,避免对当地居民造成干扰。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验