• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂性和利益冲突声明:可口可乐与国际儿童肥胖症、生活方式和环境研究(ISCOLE)主要研究者之间交换的电子邮件案例研究。

Complexity and conflicts of interest statements: a case-study of emails exchanged between Coca-Cola and the principal investigators of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE).

机构信息

Dondena Research Centre and Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

U.S. Right to Know, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2018 Feb;39(1):49-56. doi: 10.1057/s41271-017-0095-7.

DOI:10.1057/s41271-017-0095-7
PMID:29180754
Abstract

Statements on conflicts of interest provide important information for readers of scientific papers. There is now compelling evidence from several fields that papers reporting funding from organizations that have an interest in the results often generate different findings from those that do not report such funding. We describe the findings of an analysis of correspondence between representatives of a major soft drinks company and scientists researching childhood obesity. Although the studies report no influence by the funder, the correspondence describes detailed exchanges on the study design, presentation of results and acknowledgement of funding. This raises important questions about the meaning of standard statements on conflicts of interest.

摘要

利益冲突声明为科学论文的读者提供了重要信息。现在,来自多个领域的有力证据表明,报告资金来自对研究结果有利益关系的组织的论文,往往会产生与那些没有报告此类资金的论文不同的研究结果。我们描述了对一家大型软饮料公司代表与研究儿童肥胖症的科学家之间通信的分析结果。尽管这些研究报告没有受到资助者的影响,但这些信件描述了关于研究设计、结果呈现和资金承认的详细交流。这就提出了关于利益冲突标准声明含义的重要问题。

相似文献

1
Complexity and conflicts of interest statements: a case-study of emails exchanged between Coca-Cola and the principal investigators of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE).复杂性和利益冲突声明:可口可乐与国际儿童肥胖症、生活方式和环境研究(ISCOLE)主要研究者之间交换的电子邮件案例研究。
J Public Health Policy. 2018 Feb;39(1):49-56. doi: 10.1057/s41271-017-0095-7.
2
"Always read the small print": a case study of commercial research funding, disclosure and agreements with Coca-Cola.“总是阅读小字印刷部分”:可口可乐商业研究资助、披露和协议案例研究。
J Public Health Policy. 2019 Sep;40(3):273-285. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00170-9.
3
Research partnerships between Coca-Cola and health organizations in Spain.可口可乐与西班牙卫生组织的合作研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(5):810-815. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky175.
4
Evaluating Coca-Cola's attempts to influence public health 'in their own words': analysis of Coca-Cola emails with public health academics leading the Global Energy Balance Network.评估可口可乐公司试图用他们自己的话来影响公众健康的尝试:对可口可乐公司与领导全球能量平衡网络的公共卫生学者之间往来电子邮件的分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(14):2647-2653. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002098. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Public Meets Private: Conversations Between Coca-Cola and the CDC.公众与私人会面:可口可乐公司与疾病预防控制中心的对话。
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):74-90. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12368. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Coca-Cola - a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola's research funding (2008-2016).可口可乐——研究伙伴关系透明度的典范?可口可乐研究资金(2008-2016 年)的网络分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(9):1594-1607. doi: 10.1017/S136898001700307X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
How Coca-Cola Shaped the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health: An Analysis of Email Exchanges between 2012 and 2014.可口可乐如何塑造国际体力活动与公共健康大会:2012 年至 2014 年电子邮件交流分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;17(23):8996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238996.
8
Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest.酒精研究与酒精饮料行业:问题、担忧及利益冲突。
Addiction. 2009 Feb;104 Suppl 1:34-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02433.x.
9
Big food and drink sponsorship of conferences and speakers: a case study of one multinational company's influence over knowledge dissemination and professional engagement.大型食品和饮料公司对会议和演讲者的赞助:以一家跨国公司对知识传播和专业参与的影响为例。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 May;26(5):1094-1111. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002506. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
10
Coca-Cola's funding of health research and partnerships.可口可乐公司对健康研究及合作项目的资助。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00397-9.

引用本文的文献

1
How independent is the international food information council from the food and beverage industry? A content analysis of internal industry documents.国际食品信息委员会对食品和饮料行业有多独立?对内部行业文件的内容分析。
Global Health. 2022 Oct 29;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00884-8.
2
Maximising the wealth of few at the expense of the health of many: a public health analysis of market power and corporate wealth and income distribution in the global soft drink market.以牺牲多数人的健康为代价来增加少数人的财富:对全球软饮料市场的市场力量和企业财富及收入分配的公共卫生分析。
Global Health. 2021 Dec 2;17(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00781-6.
3
Corporate political activity in the context of unhealthy food advertising restrictions across Transport for London: A qualitative case study.
伦敦交通局限制不健康食品广告背景下的企业政治活动:一项定性案例研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 2;18(9):e1003695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003695. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries.倡导采用有凝聚力的系统方法来开展针对非健康商品产业的研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003543.
5
How Coca-Cola Shaped the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health: An Analysis of Email Exchanges between 2012 and 2014.可口可乐如何塑造国际体力活动与公共健康大会:2012 年至 2014 年电子邮件交流分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;17(23):8996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238996.
6
Evaluating Coca-Cola's attempts to influence public health 'in their own words': analysis of Coca-Cola emails with public health academics leading the Global Energy Balance Network.评估可口可乐公司试图用他们自己的话来影响公众健康的尝试:对可口可乐公司与领导全球能量平衡网络的公共卫生学者之间往来电子邮件的分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(14):2647-2653. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002098. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Pushing partnerships: corporate influence on research and policy via the International Life Sciences Institute.推动合作:国际生命科学学会通过企业对研究和政策的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(11):2032-2040. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019005184. Epub 2020 May 18.
8
Targeting Children and Their Mothers, Building Allies and Marginalising Opposition: An Analysis of Two Coca-Cola Public Relations Requests for Proposals.针对儿童及其母亲,建立盟友,边缘化反对派:对两份可口可乐公关提案请求的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010012.
9
Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy and Practice Comment on "CIHR Health System Impact Fellows: Reflections on 'Driving Change' Within the Health System".弥合研究、政策与实践之间的差距——评“加拿大卫生研究院卫生系统影响研究员:在卫生系统内推动变革的思考”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 1;8(9):557-559. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.46.
10
Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis.含糖饮料税对购买和饮食摄入的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Sep;20(9):1187-1204. doi: 10.1111/obr.12868. Epub 2019 Jun 19.